|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jul 19, 2021 21:44:56 GMT 1
Interesting..why the TVA changed This contradicts what he said in an earlier video, but I believe Rob is correct. Stood in line with him at a con once. Dude is scary accurate with his comic book knowledge.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 3:31:23 GMT 1
Maybe because she is Norse and said this: “How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just ‘business as usual’ and some technical solutions? With today’s emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than eight and a half years… You are failing us. But the young people are starting to understand your betrayal. The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us, I say: We will never forgive you.”She sounds a vengeful as Sylvie or the unreformed Loki. And revenge is a fool's errand, but does fuel a lot of comic book narratives. The show is introducing Kang, a character who's from the 31st century. The very concept of the character contradicts the statement from the doomsayer. They got it for vengeful sounding at the expense of narrative. You know, not ever Marvel fan is a conservative. Some of us are liberals. And not everything Marvel puts in their movies pleases me as a liberal, they can skew a bit right wingie at times. However, I don’t complain. Hearing Greta’s stringent voice did not trigger me. I got the reference. And functionally, we are doomed. We got maybe 20 years before all hell breaks loose and we face a planetary environmental and monetary collapse. The glaciers on Greenland and Northern Canada are melting dumping fresh water into the Gulf Stream, This could trigger a dryas. Also, thawing permafrost is emitting even more greenhouse gases and long dormant viruses…along with 3 million leaking gas and oil well heads admitting tons of methane in the US alone. They are polluting our decreasing potable water. We can’t even get an infrastructure bill passed in Congress due to conservatives opposition to anything that smacks Democratic. I love Marvel sci-fi fantasy, but I don’t live in it.
|
|
|
Post by maximura on Jul 20, 2021 8:04:21 GMT 1
The show is introducing Kang, a character who's from the 31st century. The very concept of the character contradicts the statement from the doomsayer. They got it for vengeful sounding at the expense of narrative. You know, not ever Marvel fan is a conservative. Some of us are liberals. And not everything Marvel puts in their movies pleases me as a liberal, they can skew a bit right wingie at times. However, I don’t complain. Hearing Greta’s stringent voice did not trigger me. I got the reference. And functionally, we are doomed. We got maybe 20 years before all hell breaks loose and we face a planetary environmental and monetary collapse. The glaciers on Greenland and Northern Canada are melting dumping fresh water into the Gulf Stream, This could trigger a dryas. Also, thawing permafrost is emitting even more greenhouse gases and long dormant viruses…along with 3 million leaking gas and oil well heads admitting tons of methane in the US alone. They are polluting our decreasing potable water. We can’t even get an infrastructure bill passed in Congress due to conservatives opposition to anything that smacks Democratic. I love Marvel sci-fi fantasy, but I don’t live in it. I was in no way triggered. She is a child that dropped out of high school and was granted the world stage to yell at people despite having zero expertise specifically because it's difficult to comment against a child. The source for her information, the climate activists' window, and your timeline is the worst possible projection out of about fifteen models. It would be like using the most outlying hurricane path projection as the way you prep for a hurricane. My problem is that it's a dishonest approach because nobody mentions the other projections when referencing it, but more importantly, Marvel has no need to throw their hat in on supporting the ravings of a child being coached to manipulate the global population, particularly when it goes against the story. I actually tend to side with the environmentalists on many issues, but when people lie to me and attempt to use alarmism to manipulate the views of the population around me, I stop listening to them. A decent leadership example would be to explain the entire situation, rather than just the worst model. A terrible example would be to prop up a screeching harpy to chastise world leaders with emotional nonsense. I don't care if someone is liberal, I care about dishonest manipulations designed to create activism without the responsibility of even mentioning the other models. We actually are blaming climate change for poor forest management, migration from South America (like you need climate as a reason to leave a drug war), and every hurricane, but have announced that Cuban refugees, people from an island regularly beset by hurricanes, aren't welcome. We don't believe our own climate rhetoric. An honest world would never have propped up Greta to lecture the population or make such ludicrous claims, so I can't trust her or the people who put that on the news. I also wouldn't expect the kids from Harry Potter to have tried to sell me on the Global War on Terror. Marvel should leave her out because when you introduce real world issues into a cinematic universe like that it begs other questions that don't need to be a part of it. We were going to tactical nuke New York, what would the fallout have been on the environment? Did the alien weaponry have a long term environmental impact or cause cancer to anyone around? What about lung conditions caused by the debris or suddenly breathing in the dust of half the population? It's a fantasy universe. They shoot themselves in the foot when they place activism on the forefront. Her use is the darkest blot in all of Loki. I shouldn't be here. I should be enjoying Loki. But these men in studios have forced me to discuss climate activism off an otherwise terrific show. (It was my best Greta from memory. Forgive the laziness of not looking up the actual speech.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 11:43:03 GMT 1
You know, not ever Marvel fan is a conservative. Some of us are liberals. And not everything Marvel puts in their movies pleases me as a liberal, they can skew a bit right wingie at times. However, I don’t complain. Hearing Greta’s stringent voice did not trigger me. I got the reference. And functionally, we are doomed. We got maybe 20 years before all hell breaks loose and we face a planetary environmental and monetary collapse. The glaciers on Greenland and Northern Canada are melting dumping fresh water into the Gulf Stream, This could trigger a dryas. Also, thawing permafrost is emitting even more greenhouse gases and long dormant viruses…along with 3 million leaking gas and oil well heads admitting tons of methane in the US alone. They are polluting our decreasing potable water. We can’t even get an infrastructure bill passed in Congress due to conservatives opposition to anything that smacks Democratic. I love Marvel sci-fi fantasy, but I don’t live in it. I was in no way triggered. She is a child that dropped out of high school and was granted the world stage to yell at people despite having zero expertise specifically because it's difficult to comment against a child. The source for her information, the climate activists' window, and your timeline is the worst possible projection out of about fifteen models. It would be like using the most outlying hurricane path projection as the way you prep for a hurricane. My problem is that it's a dishonest approach because nobody mentions the other projections when referencing it, but more importantly, Marvel has no need to throw their hat in on supporting the ravings of a child being coached to manipulate the global population, particularly when it goes against the story. I actually tend to side with the environmentalists on many issues, but when people lie to me and attempt to use alarmism to manipulate the views of the population around me, I stop listening to them. A decent leadership example would be to explain the entire situation, rather than just the worst model. A terrible example would be to prop up a screeching harpy to chastise world leaders with emotional nonsense. I don't care if someone is liberal, I care about dishonest manipulations designed to create activism without the responsibility of even mentioning the other models. We actually are blaming climate change for poor forest management, migration from South America (like you need climate as a reason to leave a drug war), and every hurricane, but have announced that Cuban refugees, people from an island regularly beset by hurricanes, aren't welcome. We don't believe our own climate rhetoric. An honest world would never have propped up Greta to lecture the population or make such ludicrous claims, so I can't trust her or the people who put that on the news. I also wouldn't expect the kids from Harry Potter to have tried to sell me on the Global War on Terror. Marvel should leave her out because when you introduce real world issues into a cinematic universe like that it begs other questions that don't need to be a part of it. We were going to tactical nuke New York, what would the fallout have been on the environment? Did the alien weaponry have a long term environmental impact or cause cancer to anyone around? What about lung conditions caused by the debris or suddenly breathing in the dust of half the population? It's a fantasy universe. They shoot themselves in the foot when they place activism on the forefront. Her use is the darkest blot in all of Loki. I shouldn't be here. I should be enjoying Loki. But these men in studios have forced me to discuss climate activism off an otherwise terrific show. (It was my best Greta from memory. Forgive the laziness of not looking up the actual speech.) Alarmism is correct Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
link
|
|
|
Post by maximura on Jul 20, 2021 12:05:14 GMT 1
I was in no way triggered. She is a child that dropped out of high school and was granted the world stage to yell at people despite having zero expertise specifically because it's difficult to comment against a child. The source for her information, the climate activists' window, and your timeline is the worst possible projection out of about fifteen models. It would be like using the most outlying hurricane path projection as the way you prep for a hurricane. My problem is that it's a dishonest approach because nobody mentions the other projections when referencing it, but more importantly, Marvel has no need to throw their hat in on supporting the ravings of a child being coached to manipulate the global population, particularly when it goes against the story. I actually tend to side with the environmentalists on many issues, but when people lie to me and attempt to use alarmism to manipulate the views of the population around me, I stop listening to them. A decent leadership example would be to explain the entire situation, rather than just the worst model. A terrible example would be to prop up a screeching harpy to chastise world leaders with emotional nonsense. I don't care if someone is liberal, I care about dishonest manipulations designed to create activism without the responsibility of even mentioning the other models. We actually are blaming climate change for poor forest management, migration from South America (like you need climate as a reason to leave a drug war), and every hurricane, but have announced that Cuban refugees, people from an island regularly beset by hurricanes, aren't welcome. We don't believe our own climate rhetoric. An honest world would never have propped up Greta to lecture the population or make such ludicrous claims, so I can't trust her or the people who put that on the news. I also wouldn't expect the kids from Harry Potter to have tried to sell me on the Global War on Terror. Marvel should leave her out because when you introduce real world issues into a cinematic universe like that it begs other questions that don't need to be a part of it. We were going to tactical nuke New York, what would the fallout have been on the environment? Did the alien weaponry have a long term environmental impact or cause cancer to anyone around? What about lung conditions caused by the debris or suddenly breathing in the dust of half the population? It's a fantasy universe. They shoot themselves in the foot when they place activism on the forefront. Her use is the darkest blot in all of Loki. I shouldn't be here. I should be enjoying Loki. But these men in studios have forced me to discuss climate activism off an otherwise terrific show. (It was my best Greta from memory. Forgive the laziness of not looking up the actual speech.) Alarmism is correct Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
linkThere are interesting factors to the idea. The massive dump of fresh water is curious as many rivers have been doing that for all of time. We often forget the oceans have become more salt bearing over millennia of mountain sediment being washed into them from those rivers. If we're simultaneously concerned with limits to potable water, why aren't we just collecting the glacier melt rather than permitting it to flow into the ocean? Why do we tear down fields for solar panels when we need vegetation to consume CO2? We could easily build panels onto the tops of all buildings rather than destroying useful expansive land for them. Large cities have virtually mandated massive travel of food resources, yet could easily convert unused buildings into hydroponic farms which could be run on the electricity gathered by covering the sprawling expanse of anti-nature with solar panels. The places most coaching us about climate change are the worst sources of smog and ecosystem destruction but pretend they are the leaders of environmentalism. It's just endless hypocrisy without feasible solutions. Then they pick a high school drop out as the subject matter expert. She was a prop. I was hoping that everyone recognized that. I honestly didn't know anyone took her seriously, so I was shocked Loki would include her. I love nature. I prefer it many times over to the convenience of a city. I'm an Eagle Scout and my project was building bridges on the Florida trail. I spend nearly every weekend in different sections of woods. I try to carry bugs out of my house rather than killing them when possible. Theoretically, I'm an easy sell on environmental issues, which makes their ability to chase me away from believing them a pretty bad sign. You have to be pretty transparently and consistently full of it to get me to not care on the issue I care most about.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 12:30:34 GMT 1
Alarmism is correct Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
link Already enough water from dams and Im guessing collecting the glacier melt is far too expensive. Also if it really came to it, de-salination plants? I mean if it was that dire? I believe some ME countries are already making use of this tech. I do see your point Depends on the type of fields, may be insignificant. I believe algae or algae-like organisms (cant remember the exact one) make up a fair amount for the conversion of CO2 to O2. Something like 30 to 50% of the world's supply? Needs to be noted. Sounds about right. Additionally I was equally annoyed by her inclusion, why I singled it out. There are far better environmentalists than her and with the solid years of background to boot. It's an insult to them and historically/living famous people in general that have contributed something good to mankind I almost liken Floyd's martyrdom to her misguided inclusion...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 12:38:12 GMT 1
Oh I neglected to address something. The unused buildings-although unused it still falls under private ownership or public (you'd have to negotiate with local and state govts). Perhaps new federal legislation and a campaign? You'd also be creating more CO2 emissions with hydroponics. Undoubtedly the Greenies would complain about that and that the plants arent as good for whatever reason
|
|
|
Post by maximura on Jul 20, 2021 13:03:20 GMT 1
Oh I neglected to address something. The unused buildings-although unused it still falls under private ownership or public (you'd have to negotiate with local and state govts). Perhaps new federal legislation and a campaign? You'd also be creating more CO2 emissions with hydroponics. Undoubtedly the Greenies would complain about that and that the plants arent as good for whatever reason Admittedly it was more of a general decent idea direction rather than a fully planned solution. Atmospheric scrubbers would seem warranted also, though I'm not entirely sure we have the long-term flight capability with the air cleaning tech to pull that off just yet either. That's the fun part about actual science though, it sees needs or goals and strives to meet them. This modern claim of science seems to think itself immune to challenge or need of proof. I mean, we virtually shut down communication on some topics to protect the branding and continue to do so. The idea that opinions, perceptions, or supportable differing conclusions can be labeled misinformation more or less sets the standard that you can never speak out against the standard of the day. However, as this is a Loki thread and not "Max goes to Washington", I suppose I'll let it go again and apologize via a somewhat tied to the conclusion of Loki reference. If we shadows have offended, Think but this, and all is mended, That you have but slumbered here While these visions did appear. And this weak and idle theme, No more yielding but a dream, Gentles, do not reprehend: If you pardon, we will mend: And, as I am an honest Puck, If we have unearned luck Now to 'scape the serpent's tongue, We will make amends ere long; Else the Puck a liar call; So, good night unto you all. Give me your hands, if we be friends, And Robin shall restore amends.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 13:09:20 GMT 1
Oh I neglected to address something. The unused buildings-although unused it still falls under private ownership or public (you'd have to negotiate with local and state govts). Perhaps new federal legislation and a campaign? You'd also be creating more CO2 emissions with hydroponics. Undoubtedly the Greenies would complain about that and that the plants arent as good for whatever reason Admittedly it was more of a general decent idea direction rather than a fully planned solution. Atmospheric scrubbers would seem warranted also, though I'm not entirely sure we have the long-term flight capability with the air cleaning tech to pull that off just yet either. That's the fun part about actual science though, it sees needs or goals and strives to meet them. This modern claim of science seems to think itself immune to challenge or need of proof. I mean, we virtually shut down communication on some topics to protect the branding and continue to do so. The idea that opinions, perceptions, or supportable differing conclusions can be labeled misinformation more or less sets the standard that you can never speak out against the standard of the day. However, as this is a Loki thread and not "Max goes to Washington", I suppose I'll let it go again and apologize via a somewhat tied to the conclusion of Loki reference. If we shadows have offended, Think but this, and all is mended, That you have but slumbered here While these visions did appear. And this weak and idle theme, No more yielding but a dream, Gentles, do not reprehend: If you pardon, we will mend: And, as I am an honest Puck, If we have unearned luck Now to 'scape the serpent's tongue, We will make amends ere long; Else the Puck a liar call; So, good night unto you all. Give me your hands, if we be friends, And Robin shall restore amends. Oh Im aware. It's not like Im that well-versed in all things environmental. Definitely not. Just using what I know already and pretty much logic. It's been a while since Ive discussed something of this nature and wanted to contribute
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 17:41:53 GMT 1
Is this a Loki thread or a Tucker Carlson fan club?
GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH CAUSED BY BAMBOO BALLOT BOXES AND GENDER NEUTRAL POTATO HEADS!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by AQUA JAR!™ on Jul 20, 2021 18:15:40 GMT 1
Is this a Loki thread or a Tucker Carlson fan club? GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH CAUSED BY BAMBOO BALLOT BOXES AND GENDER NEUTRAL POTATO HEADS!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by maximura on Jul 20, 2021 18:39:46 GMT 1
Is this a Loki thread or a Tucker Carlson fan club? GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH CAUSED BY BAMBOO BALLOT BOXES AND GENDER NEUTRAL POTATO HEADS!!!!!! Granted, some of the points were conservative. But thinking Greta was ridiculous is apolitical. Did someone here actually believe we should turn to a high school drop out for climate expertise? It makes a mockery of the entire discussion. Adding that to Loki just seems like an unnecessary distraction from an otherwise terrific show. Loki could be seen as walking a political concept line of fighting against an omnipotent autocracy in the name of personal liberty, which makes the idea of bringing Greta into it even stranger.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Jul 20, 2021 18:40:12 GMT 1
Is this a Loki thread or a Tucker Carlson fan club? GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH CAUSED BY BAMBOO BALLOT BOXES AND GENDER NEUTRAL POTATO HEADS!!!!!! I know, right? By the way Tucker Carlson should be the assistant to the villain of Captain America 4.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2021 19:38:11 GMT 1
Is this a Loki thread or a Tucker Carlson fan club? GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH CAUSED BY BAMBOO BALLOT BOXES AND GENDER NEUTRAL POTATO HEADS!!!!!! Relax, Loki's definitely a lib Bisexual, opposes Odin, allying with foreigners (battle of new york) and is the son of a Frost Giant
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 4:45:24 GMT 1
You know, not ever Marvel fan is a conservative. Some of us are liberals. And not everything Marvel puts in their movies pleases me as a liberal, they can skew a bit right wingie at times. However, I don’t complain. Hearing Greta’s stringent voice did not trigger me. I got the reference. And functionally, we are doomed. We got maybe 20 years before all hell breaks loose and we face a planetary environmental and monetary collapse. The glaciers on Greenland and Northern Canada are melting dumping fresh water into the Gulf Stream, This could trigger a dryas. Also, thawing permafrost is emitting even more greenhouse gases and long dormant viruses…along with 3 million leaking gas and oil well heads admitting tons of methane in the US alone. They are polluting our decreasing potable water. We can’t even get an infrastructure bill passed in Congress due to conservatives opposition to anything that smacks Democratic. I love Marvel sci-fi fantasy, but I don’t live in it. I was in no way triggered. She is a child that dropped out of high school and was granted the world stage to yell at people despite having zero expertise specifically because it's difficult to comment against a child. The source for her information, the climate activists' window, and your timeline is the worst possible projection out of about fifteen models. It would be like using the most outlying hurricane path projection as the way you prep for a hurricane. My problem is that it's a dishonest approach because nobody mentions the other projections when referencing it, but more importantly, Marvel has no need to throw their hat in on supporting the ravings of a child being coached to manipulate the global population, particularly when it goes against the story. I actually tend to side with the environmentalists on many issues, but when people lie to me and attempt to use alarmism to manipulate the views of the population around me, I stop listening to them. A decent leadership example would be to explain the entire situation, rather than just the worst model. A terrible example would be to prop up a screeching harpy to chastise world leaders with emotional nonsense. I don't care if someone is liberal, I care about dishonest manipulations designed to create activism without the responsibility of even mentioning the other models. We actually are blaming climate change for poor forest management, migration from South America (like you need climate as a reason to leave a drug war), and every hurricane, but have announced that Cuban refugees, people from an island regularly beset by hurricanes, aren't welcome. We don't believe our own climate rhetoric. An honest world would never have propped up Greta to lecture the population or make such ludicrous claims, so I can't trust her or the people who put that on the news. I also wouldn't expect the kids from Harry Potter to have tried to sell me on the Global War on Terror. Marvel should leave her out because when you introduce real world issues into a cinematic universe like that it begs other questions that don't need to be a part of it. We were going to tactical nuke New York, what would the fallout have been on the environment? Did the alien weaponry have a long term environmental impact or cause cancer to anyone around? What about lung conditions caused by the debris or suddenly breathing in the dust of half the population? It's a fantasy universe. They shoot themselves in the foot when they place activism on the forefront. Her use is the darkest blot in all of Loki. I shouldn't be here. I should be enjoying Loki. But these men in studios have forced me to discuss climate activism off an otherwise terrific show. (It was my best Greta from memory. Forgive the laziness of not looking up the actual speech.) They used Greta’s voice because, whether you agree with her or not, because she speaks for her generation, still children then, who will be here cleaning up after we’re gone. This TV show is about surviving apocalypses and future apocalypses. It does not matter if her shrill predictions come true, because this a science fiction/fantasy TV show. So, I get it. And Marvel has long been in the liberal political vanguard. Stan Lee’s imprint is on these productions, They don’t have to make apologies for who they are at this point. And you don’t have to watch them. My point is, look at this from a cultural perspective, rather than a political one. You can’t deny the chaos we are very much in right now…and not just the USA…and understand how our culture beyond our politics are affecting us. I draw on the parallel reality vs fiction in popular movies, so Marvel, DC, and other science fiction dramas fascinate me. No offense intended. Let’s enjoy the fun together while we can and not the strife. Edit: This white on blue copy is hell on dyslexics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 4:54:27 GMT 1
Is this a Loki thread or a Tucker Carlson fan club? GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH CAUSED BY BAMBOO BALLOT BOXES AND GENDER NEUTRAL POTATO HEADS!!!!!! Relax, Loki's definitely a lib Bisexual, opposes Odin, allying with foreigners (battle of new york) and is the son of a Frost Giant Loki is wokey!
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Jul 21, 2021 11:18:42 GMT 1
Relax, Loki's definitely a lib Bisexual, opposes Odin, allying with foreigners (battle of new york) and is the son of a Frost Giant Loki is wokey! DOES THAT MEAN HE'LL GO BROKEY? ?!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 11:37:20 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 11:43:55 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2021 21:56:18 GMT 1
DOES THAT MEAN HE'LL GO BROKEY? ?!!!!! He’s already cashed the check.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jul 22, 2021 6:48:08 GMT 1
Oh, dang. Kang - confirmed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2021 10:33:15 GMT 1
Oh, dang. Kang - confirmed. Yeah it does seem like Immortus just doesnt care anymore. Maybe he did want to die after all? Just tired of it all. I mean why choose Loki/s to lead? Then again why manipulate them too and again at the end in his chamber? Puzzling thats for sure
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2021 16:57:55 GMT 1
Oh, dang. Kang - confirmed. Yeah it does seem like Immortus just doesnt care anymore. Maybe he did want to die after all? Just tired of it all. I mean why choose Loki/s to lead? Then again why manipulate them too and again at the end in his chamber? Puzzling thats for sure I guess this puzzle is for season two. I wonder why, if he can render magic inert inside the TVA, why did he let Lokis’ magical powers exist in the Void?
|
|
|
Post by AQUA CAT! on Jul 22, 2021 18:36:14 GMT 1
Well I'm caught up now. How does one even begin to hope of joining a conversation so thoroughly in progress.
I liked it. I liked Sylvie, Owen Wilson was well cast (much to my surprise); I liked a lot of imagery in the show: castles at the end of the world, time travel analogized as trees branching off... Of course there's a conspiracy about the TVA. It worked for me. I like the idea of the Time Keepers, especially visual monuments to their existence, the gravitas in their statues.
I like Gugu M'batha Raw quite a bit. Jonathan Majors as the new next big bad guy works for me. He did well in Da 5 Bloods and he was excellent in The Last Black Man in San Francisco.
I like this world above a world motif. Theoretically in the TVA, someone like Thanos would be manhandled by your average guard or clerk all the same. Loki himself did quite well. Sylvie is what worked for me the most, but I especially like the TVA reveal that the employees were subtly kidnapped from their own timeline and brainwashed.
Yeah, it was good. Probably the best and more enduring of the 3 Disney + shows so far.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 23, 2021 1:31:40 GMT 1
Well I'm caught up now. How does one even begin to hope of joining a conversation so thoroughly in progress.
I liked it. I liked Sylvie, Owen Wilson was well cast (much to my surprise); I liked a lot of imagery in the show: castles at the end of the world, time travel analogized as trees branching off... Of course there's a conspiracy about the TVA. It worked for me. I like the idea of the Time Keepers, especially visual monuments to their existence, the gravitas in their statues.
I like Gugu M'batha Raw quite a bit. Jonathan Majors as the new next big bad guy works for me. He did well in Da 5 Bloods and he was excellent in The Last Black Man in San Francisco.
I like this world above a world motif. Theoretically in the TVA, someone like Thanos would be manhandled by your average guard or clerk all the same. Loki himself did quite well. Sylvie is what worked for me the most, but I especially like the TVA reveal that the employees were subtly kidnapped from their own timeline and brainwashed.
Yeah, it was good. Probably the best and more enduring of the 3 Disney + shows so far.
I'm with you Cat. I found this series intriguing start to finish, from the concept, to settings and visuals, to the music, and quite a few of the characters. It was just trippy and odd in a great way, and conceptually it's just literally and figuratively on a different level. The way that the characters didn't want to adhere to their destined traits but ended up needing to anyway was fantastic, and the way they introduced Kang by killing a benevolent version who promised to return. I mean that's just bonkers. Great stuff, I give it Wizard of Oz out of Secret Wars
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2021 6:24:22 GMT 1
Well I'm caught up now. How does one even begin to hope of joining a conversation so thoroughly in progress.
I liked it. I liked Sylvie, Owen Wilson was well cast (much to my surprise); I liked a lot of imagery in the show: castles at the end of the world, time travel analogized as trees branching off... Of course there's a conspiracy about the TVA. It worked for me. I like the idea of the Time Keepers, especially visual monuments to their existence, the gravitas in their statues.
I like Gugu M'batha Raw quite a bit. Jonathan Majors as the new next big bad guy works for me. He did well in Da 5 Bloods and he was excellent in The Last Black Man in San Francisco.
I like this world above a world motif. Theoretically in the TVA, someone like Thanos would be manhandled by your average guard or clerk all the same. Loki himself did quite well. Sylvie is what worked for me the most, but I especially like the TVA reveal that the employees were subtly kidnapped from their own timeline and brainwashed.
Yeah, it was good. Probably the best and more enduring of the 3 Disney + shows so far.
I'm with you Cat. I found this series intriguing start to finish, from the concept, to settings and visuals, to the music, and quite a few of the characters. It was just trippy and odd in a great way, and conceptually it's just literally and figuratively on a different level. The way that the characters didn't want to adhere to their destined traits but ended up needing to anyway was fantastic, and the way they introduced Kang by killing a benevolent version who promised to return. I mean that's just bonkers. Great stuff, I give it Wizard of Oz out of Secret Wars Agree with that apart from the pilot
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 23, 2021 17:25:34 GMT 1
I'm with you Cat. I found this series intriguing start to finish, from the concept, to settings and visuals, to the music, and quite a few of the characters. It was just trippy and odd in a great way, and conceptually it's just literally and figuratively on a different level. The way that the characters didn't want to adhere to their destined traits but ended up needing to anyway was fantastic, and the way they introduced Kang by killing a benevolent version who promised to return. I mean that's just bonkers. Great stuff, I give it Wizard of Oz out of Secret Wars Agree with that apart from the pilot Episode 1 was legit one of my favorites. It made me feel like I felt reading my favorite comics, sinking you into this bizarre world but with a deeply personal story. Legit if everything was that good I’d never leave the couch.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Jul 26, 2021 17:00:28 GMT 1
Guys...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2021 21:48:25 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 27, 2021 0:30:59 GMT 1
Very interesting. Im wondering is there a specific key for syncing it up this way? What I mean is there something here I’m not noticing for thinking these are as related as it’s implied?
|
|