|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 15, 2021 0:50:04 GMT 1
I was thinking about this a bit. Obviously all the higher power stuff didn’t pan out but some other stuff loosely played out. Agatha did use the kids. The kids did die in a sense. Wanda didn't create house of M but she did show an ability to generate alternate realities and it does looks like she’s about to open up some others to find her kids. Classic vision is gone. So some of that went at least in the direction of predictions HOWEVER! I fully agree we shouldn’t go too far with this stuff. I’m sorry but anybody upset over Foxverse Quicksilver didn’t see the writing on the wall or that it was never a quality or necessary idea to connect to Fox. As I’ve said all along, the MCU isn’t everybody else’s playground, and you don’t just shove somebody else’s work into your own. It’s weird. I never cared about that, personally. My theory that the X Men will come from the multiverse never included the Fox version until Evans showed up. And even then I thought (however temporarily) that they would use him like they seem to be using Molina and Foxx in the Spidery multiverse. (Not the same exact versions, just the same actors) But that being said: doesn’t Marvel carry some responsibility for this too? Why did they use Evans anyway? At best it was a tacky meta joke, at worst you could argue that they were deliberately trolling fans of the X Men movies. Either way it seems gratuitous and unnecessary so they shouldn’t be shocked that some people were disappointed in the end because of it. naaaa. They’re responsibility is to great product and once you this as a great callback and uniquely interesting way to build audience mystery, that’s exactly what it is. A great product. They aren’t responsible for people who get addicted to one answer they want. They aren’t responsible for capitulating to the lowest common denominator. I don’t blame anybody who wanted Fox QS. But if you wanted it so bad that you didn’t see that he was likely being manipulated just like everybody else in town, then it’s on whoever felt that way. They don’t have to sacrifice an amazing easteregg that has never been pulled off because people thought the MCU owes cannon to Foxverse. I thought what they did with this was all too clever.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Mar 15, 2021 1:17:57 GMT 1
I was thinking about this a bit. Obviously all the higher power stuff didn’t pan out but some other stuff loosely played out. Agatha did use the kids. The kids did die in a sense. Wanda didn't create house of M but she did show an ability to generate alternate realities and it does looks like she’s about to open up some others to find her kids. Classic vision is gone. So some of that went at least in the direction of predictions HOWEVER! I fully agree we shouldn’t go too far with this stuff. I’m sorry but anybody upset over Foxverse Quicksilver didn’t see the writing on the wall or that it was never a quality or necessary idea to connect to Fox. As I’ve said all along, the MCU isn’t everybody else’s playground, and you don’t just shove somebody else’s work into your own. It’s weird. I never cared about that, personally. My theory that the X Men will come from the multiverse never included the Fox version until Evans showed up. And even then I thought (however temporarily) that they would use him like they seem to be using Molina and Foxx in the Spidery multiverse. (Not the same exact versions, just the same actors) But that being said: doesn’t Marvel carry some responsibility for this too? Why did they use Evans anyway? At best it was a tacky meta joke, at worst you could argue that they were deliberately trolling fans of the X Men movies. Either way it seems gratuitous and unnecessary so they shouldn’t be shocked that some people were disappointed in the end because of it. I think the worst offense with Evan Peters was wasting him on a boner joke.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:19:49 GMT 1
I never cared about that, personally. My theory that the X Men will come from the multiverse never included the Fox version until Evans showed up. And even then I thought (however temporarily) that they would use him like they seem to be using Molina and Foxx in the Spidery multiverse. (Not the same exact versions, just the same actors) But that being said: doesn’t Marvel carry some responsibility for this too? Why did they use Evans anyway? At best it was a tacky meta joke, at worst you could argue that they were deliberately trolling fans of the X Men movies. Either way it seems gratuitous and unnecessary so they shouldn’t be shocked that some people were disappointed in the end because of it. I think the worst offense with Evan Peters was wasting him on a boner joke. Evan Peters is a popular enough actor to say "No" to the gig. He signed on while being in on the joke from day one. It was as much his decision as it was theirs'. So I see no waste.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Mar 15, 2021 1:23:05 GMT 1
I think the worst offense with Evan Peters was wasting him on a boner joke. Evan Peters is a popular enough actor to say "No" to the gig. He signed on while being in on the joke from day one. It was as much his decision as it was theirs'. So I see no waste. Obviously he's going to take the role. It's a easy paycheck. But it was absolutely a waste of a good actor given the payoff. Granted Marvel has wasted other good actors in the past but I can sympathize with those who are upset about the role he was given.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:23:58 GMT 1
I never cared about that, personally. My theory that the X Men will come from the multiverse never included the Fox version until Evans showed up. And even then I thought (however temporarily) that they would use him like they seem to be using Molina and Foxx in the Spidery multiverse. (Not the same exact versions, just the same actors) But that being said: doesn’t Marvel carry some responsibility for this too? Why did they use Evans anyway? At best it was a tacky meta joke, at worst you could argue that they were deliberately trolling fans of the X Men movies. Either way it seems gratuitous and unnecessary so they shouldn’t be shocked that some people were disappointed in the end because of it. naaaa. They’re responsibility is to great product and once you this as a great callback and uniquely interesting way to build audience mystery, that’s exactly what it is. A great product. They aren’t responsible for people who get addicted to one answer they want. They aren’t responsible for capitulating to the lowest common denominator. I don’t blame anybody who wanted Fox QS. But if you wanted it so bad that you didn’t see that he was likely being manipulated just like everybody else in town, then it’s on whoever felt that way. They don’t have to sacrifice an amazing easteregg that has never been pulled off because people thought the MCU owes cannon to Foxverse. I thought what they did with this was all too clever. Well, let me ask you this: what exactly was the point of it? So let's look at The Mandarin twist by comparison. The Mandarin is a notable Iron Man villain that was expected, but seen as problematic due to the yellow menace subtext. So they cleverly flipped it around and made the propaganda of it the entire motivation of the true villain. That's clever. I don't particularly like the execution of it, but it's clever. Now, take WV. No one expected QS to be there. They chose to use that actor knowing what people would think and then revealed him to be an actor named Dick Boner. Aside from an extremely meta gag, what was the point?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:25:27 GMT 1
Evan Peters is a popular enough actor to say "No" to the gig. He signed on while being in on the joke from day one. It was as much his decision as it was theirs'. So I see no waste. Obviously he's going to take the role. It's a easy paycheck. But it was absolutely a waste of a good actor given the payoff. Granted Marvel has wasted other good actors in the past but I can sympathize with those who are upset about the role he was given. Has Evan Peters complained?
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Mar 15, 2021 1:26:42 GMT 1
Obviously he's going to take the role. It's a easy paycheck. But it was absolutely a waste of a good actor given the payoff. Granted Marvel has wasted other good actors in the past but I can sympathize with those who are upset about the role he was given. Has Evan Peters complained? No, why would he? It was a easy paycheck. Still I think he deserves better than he was given.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:29:09 GMT 1
naaaa. They’re responsibility is to great product and once you this as a great callback and uniquely interesting way to build audience mystery, that’s exactly what it is. A great product. They aren’t responsible for people who get addicted to one answer they want. They aren’t responsible for capitulating to the lowest common denominator. I don’t blame anybody who wanted Fox QS. But if you wanted it so bad that you didn’t see that he was likely being manipulated just like everybody else in town, then it’s on whoever felt that way. They don’t have to sacrifice an amazing easteregg that has never been pulled off because people thought the MCU owes cannon to Foxverse. I thought what they did with this was all too clever. Well, let me ask you this: what exactly was the point of it? So let's look at The Mandarin twist by comparison. The Mandarin is a notable Iron Man villain that was expected, but seen as problematic due to the yellow menace subtext. So they cleverly flipped it around and made the propaganda of it the entire motivation of the true villain. That's clever. I don't particularly like the execution of it, but it's clever. Now, take WV. No one expected QS to be there. They chose to use that actor knowing what people would think and then revealed him to be an actor named Dick Boner. Aside from an extremely meta gag, what was the point? linkFrom Feige: "That's one of the fun things about developing these things or blue-skying it in the rooms. My favorite part of the process is always the very, very beginning when we're figuring out what something could be and at the very, very end when we're refining it and putting it out into the world. So there were all sorts of discussions, but I believe we ended up going with what you saw relatively early on in the development process. It's just another way that certain people were messing around with Wanda."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:29:43 GMT 1
Has Evan Peters complained? No, why would he? It was a easy paycheck. Still I think he deserves better than he was given. What is the title of the series we're arguing about?
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Mar 15, 2021 1:30:52 GMT 1
No, why would he? It was a easy paycheck. Still I think he deserves better than he was given. What is the title of the series we're arguing about? Wandavision? Oh right I forgot. Criticism is forbidden. Sorry
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:32:32 GMT 1
What is the title of the series we're arguing about? Wandavision? Oh right I forgot. Criticism is forbidden. Sorry So it stands to reason that the focus needs to remain on Wanda and Vision, right?
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Mar 15, 2021 1:34:30 GMT 1
Wandavision? Oh right I forgot. Criticism is forbidden. Sorry So it stands to reason that the focus needs to remain on Wanda and Vision, right? Literally no one is saying that the focus should have been taken off of Wanda and Vision.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:37:03 GMT 1
So it stands to reason that the focus needs to remain on Wanda and Vision, right? Literally no one is saying that the focus should have been taken off of Wanda and Vision. Nine episodes. They'd have had to sacrifice screen-time needed for Wanda and Vision to explore Peter having been ripped from his dimension and placed in ours'. Is it really so hard to just like something for what it is and what it did, instead of fixating on what it isn't, or didn't do?
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Mar 15, 2021 1:41:00 GMT 1
Literally no one is saying that the focus should have been taken off of Wanda and Vision. Nine episodes. They'd have had to sacrifice screen-time needed for Wanda and Vision to explore Peter having been ripped from his dimension and placed in ours'. Is it really so hard to just like something for what it is and what it did, instead of fixating on what it isn't, or didn't do? I only said one negative thing about the show. I even said that it was a great first series attempt by Marvel Studios. The criticism I wrote wasn't even the most harsh that I've seen said about Wandavision. Honestly it's probably the most tamed.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Mar 15, 2021 1:42:24 GMT 1
Also I don't even necessarily believed that Peters had to be Quicksilver.
I just thought that making him a boner joke was lame.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:43:16 GMT 1
Nine episodes. They'd have had to sacrifice screen-time needed for Wanda and Vision to explore Peter having been ripped from his dimension and placed in ours'. Is it really so hard to just like something for what it is and what it did, instead of fixating on what it isn't, or didn't do? I only said one negative thing about the show. I even said that it was a great first series attempt by Marvel Studios. The criticism I wrote wasn't even the most harsh that I've seen said about Wandavision. Honestly it's probably the most tamed. Fair enough. I just think too big of a deal is being made out of this one aspect by too many.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:44:44 GMT 1
Also I don't even necessarily believed that Peters had to be Quicksilver. I just thought that making him a boner joke was lame. If Alfred Molina turns out to be an “actor” named P. Enis Von Hardcock I’m going to be very angry!
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 15, 2021 1:51:34 GMT 1
naaaa. They’re responsibility is to great product and once you this as a great callback and uniquely interesting way to build audience mystery, that’s exactly what it is. A great product. They aren’t responsible for people who get addicted to one answer they want. They aren’t responsible for capitulating to the lowest common denominator. I don’t blame anybody who wanted Fox QS. But if you wanted it so bad that you didn’t see that he was likely being manipulated just like everybody else in town, then it’s on whoever felt that way. They don’t have to sacrifice an amazing easteregg that has never been pulled off because people thought the MCU owes cannon to Foxverse. I thought what they did with this was all too clever. Well, let me ask you this: what exactly was the point of it? So let's look at The Mandarin twist by comparison. The Mandarin is a notable Iron Man villain that was expected, but seen as problematic due to the yellow menace subtext. So they cleverly flipped it around and made the propaganda of it the entire motivation of the true villain. That's clever. I don't particularly like the execution of it, but it's clever. Now, take WV. No one expected QS to be there. They chose to use that actor knowing what people would think and then revealed him to be an actor named Dick Boner. Aside from an extremely meta gag, what was the point? The point was to sow the same kind of uncertainty in the audience that Wanda herself was experiencing. She’s a woman in denial and great pain, who’s willing to ignore what she knows to maintain an illusion. And the audience here ignores what they know, that this is not a Foxverse QS in order to maintain their illusion. It’s very human and very cool to pull that off. The Bhoner thing is more of a reference to the character of Boner on Growing Pains than anything else. It’s also an awesome callback and reference to the past Fox franchise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 1:54:52 GMT 1
Well, let me ask you this: what exactly was the point of it? So let's look at The Mandarin twist by comparison. The Mandarin is a notable Iron Man villain that was expected, but seen as problematic due to the yellow menace subtext. So they cleverly flipped it around and made the propaganda of it the entire motivation of the true villain. That's clever. I don't particularly like the execution of it, but it's clever. Now, take WV. No one expected QS to be there. They chose to use that actor knowing what people would think and then revealed him to be an actor named Dick Boner. Aside from an extremely meta gag, what was the point? The point was to sow the same kind of uncertainty in the audience that Wanda herself was experiencing. She’s a woman in denial and great pain, who’s willing to ignore what she knows to maintain an illusion. And the audience here ignores what they know, that this is not a Foxverse QS in order to maintain their illusion. It’s very human and very cool to pull that off. It’s also an awesome callback and reference to a past franchise. Too meta for my tastes. As I said above, I just hope they aren’t doing this in Spidey 3.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Mar 15, 2021 1:56:13 GMT 1
I only said one negative thing about the show. I even said that it was a great first series attempt by Marvel Studios. The criticism I wrote wasn't even the most harsh that I've seen said about Wandavision. Honestly it's probably the most tamed. Fair enough. I just think too big of a deal is being made out of this one aspect by too many. Regardless of whether or not anyone thinks WandaVision was good or bad, there's no denying that it was an unqualified success for Disney. What that means for MCU fans is that we will get more streaming content (beyond what was already announced). And that is quite literally all that matters. If you don't like surprises, inside jokes, or a little self awareness... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The only thing that truly bothered me about the series was the uninspired "science" villain. And SWORD's debut ended up being far more lackluster than I'd hoped. It's understandable as they'd painted themselves into a corner with SWORD long ago - SHIELD does everything that organization was ever intended to do. It's time to buckle up for the next wave of mindless theory-crafting - I'm betting on the Power Broker ending up at the center of many of these fan-fics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 2:03:11 GMT 1
Fair enough. I just think too big of a deal is being made out of this one aspect by too many. Regardless of whether or not anyone thinks WandaVision was good or bad, there's no denying that it was an unqualified success for Disney. What that means for MCU fans is that we will get more streaming content (beyond what was already announced). And that is quite literally all that matters. If you don't like surprises, inside jokes, or a little self awareness... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The only thing that truly bothered me about the series was the uninspired "science" villain. And SWORD's debut ended up being far more lackluster than I'd hoped. It's understandable as they'd painted themselves into a corner with SWORD long ago - SHIELD does everything that organization was ever intended to do. It's time to buckle up for the next wave of mindless theory-crafting - I'm betting on the Power Broker ending up at the center of many of these fan-fics. Exactly. In 5-7 years, when a new generation of kids get into the MCU and watch it in order, they're not going to give the slightest of damns that the funny man playing Fake-Pietro came from another franchise.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 15, 2021 2:11:49 GMT 1
The point was to sow the same kind of uncertainty in the audience that Wanda herself was experiencing. She’s a woman in denial and great pain, who’s willing to ignore what she knows to maintain an illusion. And the audience here ignores what they know, that this is not a Foxverse QS in order to maintain their illusion. It’s very human and very cool to pull that off. It’s also an awesome callback and reference to a past franchise. Too meta for my tastes. As I said above, I just hope they aren’t doing this in Spidey 3. I get it. I think the key is to look at it as an extended easteregg. As far as Spidey 3 goes. I wouldn’t put any money on them doing an actual Raimi or Amazing series crossover. They might, but I’ll stand on the same idea that there’s no real need to.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Mar 15, 2021 2:15:30 GMT 1
Regardless of whether or not anyone thinks WandaVision was good or bad, there's no denying that it was an unqualified success for Disney. What that means for MCU fans is that we will get more streaming content (beyond what was already announced). And that is quite literally all that matters. If you don't like surprises, inside jokes, or a little self awareness... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The only thing that truly bothered me about the series was the uninspired "science" villain. And SWORD's debut ended up being far more lackluster than I'd hoped. It's understandable as they'd painted themselves into a corner with SWORD long ago - SHIELD does everything that organization was ever intended to do. It's time to buckle up for the next wave of mindless theory-crafting - I'm betting on the Power Broker ending up at the center of many of these fan-fics. Exactly. In 5-7 years, when a new generation of kids get into the MCU and watch it in order, they're not going to give the slightest of damns that the funny man playing Fake-Pietro came from another franchise. Yeah, Fietro is a nerd nit. They had me sweating for a minute... I was expecting to have to walk back years of condemnations and devour the fandom's largest serving of crow. I said it would never happen that a merger would be a logistical, creative, and business nightmare. And when I saw Evan on that doorstep, I nearly lost my shit. But Kevin, said, "gotcha, Death Man. Gotcha, good." But how did we get here? How did we arrive on the shores of short tempers and the deepest butthut? Set photos. People saw the man in set photos and took a glorified cameo and spun it into a full-fledged storytime about Fox characters merging with MCU characters in the ultimate fan orgasm. Tsk... Tsk... If we'd have even thought it through for a single second... Hee hee hee... These are 'the slings and arrows of outrageous fandom.'
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 15, 2021 2:24:00 GMT 1
Also I don't even necessarily believed that Peters had to be Quicksilver. I just thought that making him a boner joke was lame. If Alfred Molina turns out to be an “actor” named P. Enis Von Hardcock I’m going to be very angry! Funny you say that because it wouldn’t at all surprise me if they have an in universe production of Spiderman adventures that play on Broadway or something. Or if Molina is actually playing a new version of Otto. Either way, I’d say spiderverse is a little less likely than some other possibilities, but I’m open to any of those.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 15, 2021 2:28:08 GMT 1
Exactly. In 5-7 years, when a new generation of kids get into the MCU and watch it in order, they're not going to give the slightest of damns that the funny man playing Fake-Pietro came from another franchise. Yeah, Fietro is a nerd nit. They had me sweating for a minute... I was expecting to have to walk back years of condemnations and devour the fandom's largest serving of crow. I said it would never happen that a merger would be a logistical, creative, and business nightmare. And when I saw Evan on that doorstep, I nearly lost my shit. But Kevin, said, "gotcha, Death Man. Gotcha, good." But how did we get here? How did we arrive on the shores of short tempers and the deepest butthut? Set photos. People saw the man in set photos and took a glorified cameo and spun it into a full-fledged storytime about Fox characters merging with MCU characters in the ultimate fan orgasm. Tsk... Tsk... If we'd have even thought it through for a single second... Hee hee hee... These are 'the slings and arrows of outrageous fandom.' I will proudly say I thought it through. At the risk of sounding boisterous, I, much like you, have always thought that crossover sounded like a mess in the making and that they were above doing it. So I can’t quite say I get the orgasm over the idea of actually doing it. It just seemed lowest common denominator to me, but I do sort of get the intent. IF!! If if if if if Fox had been awesome and they had planned working together for a long time the idea in principle is cool. It’s just given the reality of how it played out, it simply wasn’t a good idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 2:29:54 GMT 1
Exactly. In 5-7 years, when a new generation of kids get into the MCU and watch it in order, they're not going to give the slightest of damns that the funny man playing Fake-Pietro came from another franchise. Yeah, Fietro is a nerd nit. They had me sweating for a minute... I was expecting to have to walk back years of condemnations and devour the fandom's largest serving of crow. I said it would never happen that a merger would be a logistical, creative, and business nightmare. And when I saw Evan on that doorstep, I nearly lost my shit. But Kevin, said, "gotcha, Death Man. Gotcha, good." But how did we get here? How did we arrive on the shores of short tempers and the deepest butthut? Set photos. People saw the man in set photos and took a glorified cameo and spun it into a full-fledged storytime about Fox characters merging with MCU characters in the ultimate fan orgasm. Tsk... Tsk... If we'd have even thought it through for a single second... Hee hee hee... These are 'the slings and arrows of outrageous fandom.' The only reason I even considered the possibility for the moment was because Feige has worked on the X-Men films, and bringing in the FoX-Verse cast would be his way of "putting things right" with the movies that got away from him. I should have known better, and I'm it was just an Easter Egg. Thankfully, the bitterness and resentment of the fandom will pass. In time, as I said in my previous post, people who were never connected to his fandom snit will watch these movies and not give the slightest of damns about the history of Fox vs. Marvel.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 3:07:26 GMT 1
The point was to sow the same kind of uncertainty in the audience that Wanda herself was experiencing. She’s a woman in denial and great pain, who’s willing to ignore what she knows to maintain an illusion. And the audience here ignores what they know, that this is not a Foxverse QS in order to maintain their illusion. It’s very human and very cool to pull that off. It’s also an awesome callback and reference to a past franchise. Too meta for my tastes. As I said above, I just hope they aren’t doing this in Spidey 3. Peter Parker: *speaking to Tobey Maguire's character* "...Your name's Gilbert Gobblecoq?" Gilbert: "I prefer Blast Hardcheese."
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Mar 15, 2021 3:09:30 GMT 1
Yeah, Fietro is a nerd nit. They had me sweating for a minute... I was expecting to have to walk back years of condemnations and devour the fandom's largest serving of crow. I said it would never happen that a merger would be a logistical, creative, and business nightmare. And when I saw Evan on that doorstep, I nearly lost my shit. But Kevin, said, "gotcha, Death Man. Gotcha, good." But how did we get here? How did we arrive on the shores of short tempers and the deepest butthut? Set photos. People saw the man in set photos and took a glorified cameo and spun it into a full-fledged storytime about Fox characters merging with MCU characters in the ultimate fan orgasm. Tsk... Tsk... If we'd have even thought it through for a single second... Hee hee hee... These are 'the slings and arrows of outrageous fandom.' The only reason I even considered the possibility for the moment was because Feige has worked on the X-Men films, and bringing in the FoX-Verse cast would be his way of "putting things right" with the movies that got away from him. I should have known better, and I'm it was just an Easter Egg. Thankfully, the bitterness and resentment of the fandom will pass. In time, as I said in my previous post, people who were never connected to his fandom snit will watch these movies and not give the slightest of damns about the history of Fox vs. Marvel. Amen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 3:34:48 GMT 1
If Alfred Molina turns out to be an “actor” named P. Enis Von Hardcock I’m going to be very angry! Funny you say that because it wouldn’t at all surprise me if they have an in universe production of Spiderman adventures that play on Broadway or something. Or if Molina is actually playing a new version of Otto. Either way, I’d say spiderverse is a little less likely than some other possibilities, but I’m open to any of those. Will it involve another classy penis joke? 😂
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 15, 2021 4:04:07 GMT 1
Funny you say that because it wouldn’t at all surprise me if they have an in universe production of Spiderman adventures that play on Broadway or something. Or if Molina is actually playing a new version of Otto. Either way, I’d say spiderverse is a little less likely than some other possibilities, but I’m open to any of those. Will it involve another classy penis joke? 😂 I hope so :-) Seriously though, that was a Growing Pains reference more than a penis joke. The Growing Pains name was a penis joke but if they can do it then it’s fair game. I’ve never quite understood why that type of thing bothers anybody TBH
|
|