|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 12, 2020 16:44:44 GMT 1
One year old today.
Beside some documentaries Marvel hasnt released a single original show.
That sucks the big one.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 12, 2020 17:27:21 GMT 1
Yes, it does suck. I am considered to be a very patient death lord, and even I'm starting to get a bit triggered. They need to release at least one more new show right now - pandemic or not. Hopefully when all of the new series drop, it will have been worth the wait.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 12, 2020 17:31:11 GMT 1
I have the feeling it will be worth the wait but Im almost feeling the OldRose84Years.gif
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 12, 2020 18:10:00 GMT 1
I have the feeling it will be worth the wait but Im almost feeling the OldRose84Years.gif WandaVision is set for January 2021. Complain and corporate shall kowtow...
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 12, 2020 18:13:15 GMT 1
One year old today. Beside some documentaries Marvel hasnt released a single original show. That sucks the big one. that does suck, because it’s my only real interest in having the service
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 12, 2020 18:15:51 GMT 1
I have the feeling it will be worth the wait but Im almost feeling the OldRose84Years.gif WandaVision is set for January 2021. Complain and corporate shall kowtow... It still says 2020 on Disney+. So I keep hoping for Xmas day...
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 12, 2020 18:17:16 GMT 1
Never mind. Saw the ad.
Sucks!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 20:52:55 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription?
I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu?
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 12, 2020 21:09:37 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? I don't know what you mean by nothing. There's a ton of stuff in my Disney+ watch list that I haven't gotten to yet.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 12, 2020 21:27:25 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? I think my fellow subscribers and I are paying for Disney+ because it's relatively cheap compared to most major streaming services. Disney enthusiasts and people with children have plenty of content to watch. I don't own any movies at all. I sold off my (extensive) physical media collection years ago, and the proceeds have more than subsidized a $6.99/month or $69.99/year streaming service. I kind of miss the extras associated with physical media; however, I am generally glad to recover the time spent watching that stuff. I paid USD 150 for three years of Disney+ - the four dollars per month is negligible to my overall budget in the big scheme of things. If it helps Disney to produce shows of the production quality of the Mandalorian, I can only complain up to a certain extent. That said, they do need to start leveling up when it comes to the new/exclusive content they promised.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 12, 2020 21:36:20 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? I think my fellow subscribers and I are paying for Disney+ because it's relatively cheap compared to most major streaming services. Disney enthusiasts and people with children have plenty of content to watch. I don't own any movies at all. I sold off my (extensive) physical media collection years ago, and the proceeds have more than subsidized a $6.99/month or $69.99/year streaming service. I kind of miss the extras associated with physical media; however, I am generally glad to recover the time spent watching that stuff. I paid USD 150 for three years of Disney+ - the four dollars per month is negligible to my overall budget in the big scheme of things. If it helps Disney to produce shows of the production quality of the Mandalorian, I can only complain up to a certain extent. That said, they do need to start leveling up when it comes to the new/exclusive content they promised. The extra's are also on Disney+.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 12, 2020 21:38:04 GMT 1
I think my fellow subscribers and I are paying for Disney+ because it's relatively cheap compared to most major streaming services. Disney enthusiasts and people with children have plenty of content to watch. I don't own any movies at all. I sold off my (extensive) physical media collection years ago, and the proceeds have more than subsidized a $6.99/month or $69.99/year streaming service. I kind of miss the extras associated with physical media; however, I am generally glad to recover the time spent watching that stuff. I paid USD 150 for three years of Disney+ - the four dollars per month is negligible to my overall budget in the big scheme of things. If it helps Disney to produce shows of the production quality of the Mandalorian, I can only complain up to a certain extent. That said, they do need to start leveling up when it comes to the new/exclusive content they promised. The extra's are also on Disney+. I completely forgot that, thanks for reminding me. And some of them (as in the case of Captain Marvel) are exclusive to the platform.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 21:45:19 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 22:32:58 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? I think my fellow subscribers and I are paying for Disney+ because it's relatively cheap compared to most major streaming services. Disney enthusiasts and people with children have plenty of content to watch. I don't own any movies at all. I sold off my (extensive) physical media collection years ago, and the proceeds have more than subsidized a $6.99/month or $69.99/year streaming service. I kind of miss the extras associated with physical media; however, I am generally glad to recover the time spent watching that stuff. I paid USD 150 for three years of Disney+ - the four dollars per month is negligible to my overall budget in the big scheme of things. If it helps Disney to produce shows of the production quality of the Mandalorian, I can only complain up to a certain extent. That said, they do need to start leveling up when it comes to the new/exclusive content they promised. Honestly, I still don’t get it. But the “it’s cheap” reason seems to be the common one. I hear that my from my sister, who basically pays for any and every service there is despite (from what I can tell) barely watching them. It’s the thing to do now I guess. If you don’t own the movies on disc I suppose I could see the appeal though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 22:33:27 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? I don't know what you mean by nothing. There's a ton of stuff in my Disney+ watch list that I haven't gotten to yet. Such as?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 12, 2020 23:33:51 GMT 1
I think my fellow subscribers and I are paying for Disney+ because it's relatively cheap compared to most major streaming services. Disney enthusiasts and people with children have plenty of content to watch. I don't own any movies at all. I sold off my (extensive) physical media collection years ago, and the proceeds have more than subsidized a $6.99/month or $69.99/year streaming service. I kind of miss the extras associated with physical media; however, I am generally glad to recover the time spent watching that stuff. I paid USD 150 for three years of Disney+ - the four dollars per month is negligible to my overall budget in the big scheme of things. If it helps Disney to produce shows of the production quality of the Mandalorian, I can only complain up to a certain extent. That said, they do need to start leveling up when it comes to the new/exclusive content they promised. Honestly, I still don’t get it. But the “it’s cheap” reason seems to be the common one. I hear that my from my sister, who basically pays for any and every service there is despite (from what I can tell) barely watching them. It’s the thing to do now I guess. You’re basically paying to perpetually rent the movies on there. I’m much happier just having them on disc. If you don’t own them on disc I suppose I could see the appeal, but aside from that I still don’t understand why people throw money away on these streaming services. Physical owners are not in any better position than renters. The only difference is that most renters know it, and physical owners seem to think they're impervious to the future. When the popular formats change, your collection will be fodder for the landfill, and you will need to repurchase everything. And good luck if you make the wrong choice in a competing format war. For me personally, it's a waste of space and time. Physical media is dying, and even Corporate America can't be bothered to put the R and D into a new reliable physical format. The average cost of a new blu-ray is between 15 and 30 USD - at the low end, you could have bought yourself a whopping 4.6 bargain bin blu-ray discs - in a year with your Disney+ subscription money. Multiply that by a decade, and you've earned yourself 40.6 coasters. I'll take access to tens of thousands of movies that I can watch at the click of a button and opt-out of any time I wish. At least if you buy digital, there is a chance that your provider may supply higher-res offerings as an add-value down the road (kind of like getting the new iOS every year for the upfront price of the phone). Moving from 4k to 8k or 12k, quality becomes seamless and trivial. Just because "streaming services" frequently top lists of ways people "waste money" doesn't make it necessarily so - that's an assessment that has many variables associated with it. Even at my peak spending on streaming, it's still a fraction of what I paid for cable subscriptions. Having access to content on any device anywhere I am is also an added value. It justifies the relatively low monthly cost—remember you're not just paying for access to content. You're paying for infrastructure, convenience, and ongoing user interface enhancements. Tricky contracts and being forced into leasing janky hardware is also a thing of the past. Add in the fact that all of these services are sharable by four or five users at a time, and the throwing-away-money argument begins to sound more like you sell Cable subscriptions rather than you're a "smart shopper." In all honesty, it's not all that difficult to choose a streaming service - or multiple streaming services - that you - personally - will get the maximum value out of. If you like keeping up with new shows, go with Hulu; if you're into binging old stuff, try Netflix; if you're into highbrow, international cinema, try the Criterion Channel. And, by all means, if you don't watch a streaming service you're subscribed to, cancel the subscription.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 12, 2020 23:45:40 GMT 1
I don't know what you mean by nothing. There's a ton of stuff in my Disney+ watch list that I haven't gotten to yet. Such as? Classic Disney live action and animated movies and TV shows, Disney Channel Original movies, Marvel cartoons, Star Wars cartoons, National Geographic documentaries, all stuff that I don't have on DVD.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 0:44:23 GMT 1
Classic Disney live action and animated movies and TV shows, Disney Channel Original movies, Marvel cartoons, Star Wars cartoons, National Geographic documentaries, all stuff that I don't have on DVD. I was actually really looking forward to the NatGeo documentaries. But they only have a few dozen on the service out of the thousands that have been made. NatGeo has made dozens alone on Ancient Egypt over the years yet only one of these is on Disney Plus. I was extremely disappointed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 1:57:07 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? What are you talking about? If Disney animation is your jam, there's a ton of stuff on it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 2:39:45 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? What are you talking about? If Disney animation is your jam, there's a ton of stuff on it. But you have that stuff on dvd already though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 3:29:09 GMT 1
What are you talking about? If Disney animation is your jam, there's a ton of stuff on it. But you have that stuff on dvd already though. Not all of it. There is a ton on there I don't have on DVD, because a lot of it isn't on DVD. Like the second half of a lot of their animated TV shows. And a lot of their older movies I've never been sure about trying to get.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 15:11:09 GMT 1
Honestly, I still don’t get it. But the “it’s cheap” reason seems to be the common one. I hear that my from my sister, who basically pays for any and every service there is despite (from what I can tell) barely watching them. It’s the thing to do now I guess. You’re basically paying to perpetually rent the movies on there. I’m much happier just having them on disc. If you don’t own them on disc I suppose I could see the appeal, but aside from that I still don’t understand why people throw money away on these streaming services. Physical owners are not in any better position than renters. The only difference is that most renters know it, and physical owners seem to think they're impervious to the future. When the popular formats change, your collection will be fodder for the landfill, and you will need to repurchase everything. And good luck if you make the wrong choice in a competing format war. For me personally, it's a waste of space and time. Physical media is dying, and even Corporate America can't be bothered to put the R and D into a new reliable physical format. The average cost of a new blu-ray is between 15 and 30 USD - at the low end, you could have bought yourself a whopping 4.6 bargain bin blu-ray discs - in a year with your Disney+ subscription money. Multiply that by a decade, and you've earned yourself 40.6 coasters. I'll take access to tens of thousands of movies that I can watch at the click of a button and opt-out of any time I wish. At least if you buy digital, there is a chance that your provider may supply higher-res offerings as an add-value down the road (kind of like getting the new iOS every year for the upfront price of the phone). Moving from 4k to 8k or 12k, quality becomes seamless and trivial. Just because "streaming services" frequently top lists of ways people "waste money" doesn't make it necessarily so - that's an assessment that has many variables associated with it. Even at my peak spending on streaming, it's still a fraction of what I paid for cable subscriptions. Having access to content on any device anywhere I am is also an added value. It justifies the relatively low monthly cost—remember you're not just paying for access to content. You're paying for infrastructure, convenience, and ongoing user interface enhancements. Tricky contracts and being forced into leasing janky hardware is also a thing of the past. Add in the fact that all of these services are sharable by four or five users at a time, and the throwing-away-money argument begins to sound more like you sell Cable subscriptions rather than you're a "smart shopper." In all honesty, it's not all that difficult to choose a streaming service - or multiple streaming services - that you - personally - will get the maximum value out of. If you like keeping up with new shows, go with Hulu; if you're into binging old stuff, try Netflix; if you're into highbrow, international cinema, try the Criterion Channel. And, by all means, if you don't watch a streaming service you're subscribed to, cancel the subscription. Well, I’ll tell ya Skully, if I were to get rid of my physical media collection do you know how many services I’d have to subscribe to in order to have access to all my favorite shows and movies? All of them! Hulu for Seinfeld. Netflix for Breaking Bad. Amazon for Twin Peaks. NBC for Parks and Rec. CBS for Star Trek. Disney for Marvel. And so on. And so on. And so on. Month after month I’d have to pay for Hulu just for the privilege of being able to watch the occasional Seinfeld episode when I so desire. Hundreds of bucks a month with no end. And forget the money, think of the principle of it. And even then there’s dozens of movies and shows that aren’t even one these crap services! The X Files and The Office for example. Netflix lost the rights to these. I don’t see how this is the better option, Skully. At least not for me.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 13, 2020 17:05:42 GMT 1
Physical owners are not in any better position than renters. The only difference is that most renters know it, and physical owners seem to think they're impervious to the future. When the popular formats change, your collection will be fodder for the landfill, and you will need to repurchase everything. And good luck if you make the wrong choice in a competing format war. For me personally, it's a waste of space and time. Physical media is dying, and even Corporate America can't be bothered to put the R and D into a new reliable physical format. The average cost of a new blu-ray is between 15 and 30 USD - at the low end, you could have bought yourself a whopping 4.6 bargain bin blu-ray discs - in a year with your Disney+ subscription money. Multiply that by a decade, and you've earned yourself 40.6 coasters. I'll take access to tens of thousands of movies that I can watch at the click of a button and opt-out of any time I wish. At least if you buy digital, there is a chance that your provider may supply higher-res offerings as an add-value down the road (kind of like getting the new iOS every year for the upfront price of the phone). Moving from 4k to 8k or 12k, quality becomes seamless and trivial. Just because "streaming services" frequently top lists of ways people "waste money" doesn't make it necessarily so - that's an assessment that has many variables associated with it. Even at my peak spending on streaming, it's still a fraction of what I paid for cable subscriptions. Having access to content on any device anywhere I am is also an added value. It justifies the relatively low monthly cost—remember you're not just paying for access to content. You're paying for infrastructure, convenience, and ongoing user interface enhancements. Tricky contracts and being forced into leasing janky hardware is also a thing of the past. Add in the fact that all of these services are sharable by four or five users at a time, and the throwing-away-money argument begins to sound more like you sell Cable subscriptions rather than you're a "smart shopper." In all honesty, it's not all that difficult to choose a streaming service - or multiple streaming services - that you - personally - will get the maximum value out of. If you like keeping up with new shows, go with Hulu; if you're into binging old stuff, try Netflix; if you're into highbrow, international cinema, try the Criterion Channel. And, by all means, if you don't watch a streaming service you're subscribed to, cancel the subscription. Well, I’ll tell ya Skully, if I were to get rid of my physical media collection do you know how many services I’d have to subscribe to in order to have access to all my favorite shows and movies? All of them! Hulu for Seinfeld. Netflix for Breaking Bad. Amazon for Twin Peaks. NBC for Parks and Rec. CBS for Star Trek. Disney for Marvel. And so on. And so on. And so on. Month after month I’d have to pay for Hulu just for the privilege of being able to watch the occasional Seinfeld episode when I so desire. Hundreds of bucks a month with no end. And forget the money, think of the principle of it. And even then there’s dozens of movies and shows that aren’t even one these crap services! The X Files and The Office for example. Netflix lost the rights to these. I don’t see how this is the better option, Skully. At least not for me. Fair enough, I guess this all comes down to each individual's personal ethos. I've embraced a more minimalist lifestyle over the years. Being an obsessive comic book collector for over a decade got me thinking about everything I "collect." At one point, my 25000-issues comic book collection was starting to turn into a second job to manage. The same was the case for my disk collection, which numbered in the five figures. I wanted to make the shift more towards creating rather than consuming. That's not a knock on people who choose otherwise, but my possessions and obsession with collecting things was started to close in on me. I had a lot of stuff, and I was only using or experiencing a fraction of it very sporadically. I was even starting to forget what I owned on disk and making repeat purchases after a while. So then I needed a bar code scanner and software to keep up. Relative to my old collection-based habits, my leasing/renting strategy is a fraction of the cost, has cut down my clutter considerably, and has left me a lot more mindful of how I use my time. Regarding movies, I only own what is essential or extremely rare - everything else is usually just a click or two away. To each his own, my friend.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Nov 13, 2020 18:24:55 GMT 1
I can’t help but wonder why people have been paying for this service month after month. There’s literally NOTHING on it! You can watch Mando in less than a week so why keep the subscription? I assume you all already own the MCU movies on dvd and blu? Well I got the bundle with Hulu which is mostly why I still have my subscription. But yeah outside of Mandalorian and a documentary there's really nothing to watch on Disney+ for me. I'm hoping that 2021 will have more exclusive content that is interesting to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 19:35:37 GMT 1
Well, I’ll tell ya Skully, if I were to get rid of my physical media collection do you know how many services I’d have to subscribe to in order to have access to all my favorite shows and movies? All of them! Hulu for Seinfeld. Netflix for Breaking Bad. Amazon for Twin Peaks. NBC for Parks and Rec. CBS for Star Trek. Disney for Marvel. And so on. And so on. And so on. Month after month I’d have to pay for Hulu just for the privilege of being able to watch the occasional Seinfeld episode when I so desire. Hundreds of bucks a month with no end. And forget the money, think of the principle of it. And even then there’s dozens of movies and shows that aren’t even one these crap services! The X Files and The Office for example. Netflix lost the rights to these. I don’t see how this is the better option, Skully. At least not for me. Fair enough, I guess this all comes down to each individual's personal ethos. I've embraced a more minimalist lifestyle over the years. Being an obsessive comic book collector for over a decade got me thinking about everything I "collect." At one point, my 25000-issues comic book collection was starting to turn into a second job to manage. The same was the case for my disk collection, which numbered in the five figures. I wanted to make the shift more towards creating rather than consuming. That's not a knock on people who choose otherwise, but my possessions and obsession with collecting things was started to close in on me. I had a lot of stuff, and I was only using or experiencing a fraction of it very sporadically. I was even starting to forget what I owned on disk and making repeat purchases after a while. So then I needed a bar code scanner and software to keep up. Relative to my old collection-based habits, my leasing/renting strategy is a fraction of the cost, has cut down my clutter considerably, and has left me a lot more mindful of how I use my time. Regarding movies, I only own what is essential or extremely rare - everything else is usually just a click or two away. To each his own, my friend. I can understand that. I admit one of the reasons I am quick to become defensive over physical media is that it is one of the main things I enjoy collecting.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 13, 2020 19:45:29 GMT 1
Fair enough, I guess this all comes down to each individual's personal ethos. I've embraced a more minimalist lifestyle over the years. Being an obsessive comic book collector for over a decade got me thinking about everything I "collect." At one point, my 25000-issues comic book collection was starting to turn into a second job to manage. The same was the case for my disk collection, which numbered in the five figures. I wanted to make the shift more towards creating rather than consuming. That's not a knock on people who choose otherwise, but my possessions and obsession with collecting things was started to close in on me. I had a lot of stuff, and I was only using or experiencing a fraction of it very sporadically. I was even starting to forget what I owned on disk and making repeat purchases after a while. So then I needed a bar code scanner and software to keep up. Relative to my old collection-based habits, my leasing/renting strategy is a fraction of the cost, has cut down my clutter considerably, and has left me a lot more mindful of how I use my time. Regarding movies, I only own what is essential or extremely rare - everything else is usually just a click or two away. To each his own, my friend. I can understand that. I admit one of the reasons I am quick to become defensive over physical media is that it is one of the main things I enjoy collecting. Yeah it took me a while too. I collected DVD's as well. I stopped though. I will complete series I already have going but Im not starting anything new since I have three streaming services. And I have a subscription to a theater chain. I can see whatever I want. If there is an exception its a tv show not on the services I have but with Netflix, Disney and Amazon I dont see that happening very soon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 20:16:22 GMT 1
I can understand that. I admit one of the reasons I am quick to become defensive over physical media is that it is one of the main things I enjoy collecting. Yeah it took me a while too. I collected DVD's as well. I stopped though. I will complete series I already have going but Im not starting anything new since I have three streaming services. And I have a subscription to a theater chain. I can see whatever I want. If there is an exception its a tv show not on the services I have but with Netflix, Disney and Amazon I dont see that happening very soon. I’ll never switch! They’ll have to kill me first!!!!!!# As I said above I’d have to pay for all of these things to have access to everything, and the list is growing. And half of my movie collection / tv collection is not currently on any of them anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 13, 2020 20:29:22 GMT 1
Yeah it took me a while too. I collected DVD's as well. I stopped though. I will complete series I already have going but Im not starting anything new since I have three streaming services. And I have a subscription to a theater chain. I can see whatever I want. If there is an exception its a tv show not on the services I have but with Netflix, Disney and Amazon I dont see that happening very soon. I’ll never switch! They’ll have to kill me first!!!!!!# As I said above I’d have to pay for all of these things to have access to everything, and the list is growing. And half of my movie collection / tv collection is not currently on any of them anyway. Well what you have wont go away. Just make sure you have enough reserve players because they will go the way of the VCR.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 20:32:29 GMT 1
I’ll never switch! They’ll have to kill me first!!!!!!# As I said above I’d have to pay for all of these things to have access to everything, and the list is growing. And half of my movie collection / tv collection is not currently on any of them anyway. Well what you have wont go away. Just make sure you have enough reserve players because they will go the way of the VCR. Way ahead of you! I actually have four spare blu ray players. LOL. I picked them up from friends and family who were giving them away.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Nov 13, 2020 20:35:05 GMT 1
Well what you have wont go away. Just make sure you have enough reserve players because they will go the way of the VCR. Way ahead of you! I actually have four spare blu ray players. LOL. I picked them up from friends and family who were giving them away. Yeah. And if I were you I would get some new ones as well. They dont cost much. But if they stop making discs then you dont have access to new stuff anymore. You'd become like my father. He has a separate tv connected to a vcr so he can still watch what he taped in the early 80's.
|
|