Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2021 21:20:34 GMT 1
I’m curious if they’d introduce Donna Troy at all? As a potential replacement for Gadot whenever she’s decided to move on. Isn’t she the empath on Star Trek TNG?
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 5, 2021 21:29:22 GMT 1
But the big question is? Will Diana keep on raping? lol, oh yes I did. Hey, the girl in bed and possibly still actively having sex says "we should probably go figure out how a stone put my boyfriend back in another man's body". So she is straight up fully aware that they are using a complete stranger's body for sex, and at no point do they question this. Whether the guy's consciousness exists at that moment or not, they don't even hesitate. It's just A-OK. That is the single weirdest thing I've ever seen in a CBM.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2021 21:36:59 GMT 1
lol, oh yes I did. Hey, the girl in bed and possibly still actively having sex says "we should probably go figure out how a stone put my boyfriend back in another man's body". So she is straight up fully aware that they are using a complete stranger's body for sex, and at no point do they question this. Whether the guy's consciousness exists at that moment or not, they don't even hesitate. It's just A-OK. That is the single weirdest thing I've ever seen in a CBM. My lawyer from Warner told me to say this- no comment
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 5, 2021 21:44:22 GMT 1
lol, oh yes I did. Hey, the girl in bed and possibly still actively having sex says "we should probably go figure out how a stone put my boyfriend back in another man's body". So she is straight up fully aware that they are using a complete stranger's body for sex, and at no point do they question this. Whether the guy's consciousness exists at that moment or not, they don't even hesitate. It's just A-OK. That is the single weirdest thing I've ever seen in a CBM. My lawyer from Warner told me to say this- no comment This is going to sound funny, but I seriously wonder if they stopped by a 24 hour clinic on the way home from that party to get that guy tested for cooties?
|
|
|
Post by maximura on Jan 5, 2021 22:41:04 GMT 1
lol, oh yes I did. Hey, the girl in bed and possibly still actively having sex says "we should probably go figure out how a stone put my boyfriend back in another man's body". So she is straight up fully aware that they are using a complete stranger's body for sex, and at no point do they question this. Whether the guy's consciousness exists at that moment or not, they don't even hesitate. It's just A-OK. That is the single weirdest thing I've ever seen in a CBM. Nebula was distended apart for torture by her father.... Surely that was more invasive, unless handsome man is packing some serious heat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2021 22:43:35 GMT 1
^^^ gold lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2021 22:49:46 GMT 1
lol, oh yes I did. Hey, the girl in bed and possibly still actively having sex says "we should probably go figure out how a stone put my boyfriend back in another man's body". So she is straight up fully aware that they are using a complete stranger's body for sex, and at no point do they question this. Whether the guy's consciousness exists at that moment or not, they don't even hesitate. It's just A-OK. That is the single weirdest thing I've ever seen in a CBM. Nebula was distended apart for torture by her father.... Surely that was more invasive, unless handsome man is packing some serious heat. It happened to a cyborg. So theres diversity to consider too. Further down the rabbit hole we go
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 5, 2021 23:01:58 GMT 1
lol, oh yes I did. Hey, the girl in bed and possibly still actively having sex says "we should probably go figure out how a stone put my boyfriend back in another man's body". So she is straight up fully aware that they are using a complete stranger's body for sex, and at no point do they question this. Whether the guy's consciousness exists at that moment or not, they don't even hesitate. It's just A-OK. That is the single weirdest thing I've ever seen in a CBM. Nebula was distended apart for torture by her father.... Surely that was more invasive, unless handsome man is packing some serious heat. That would be a more accurate analogy if Gamora participated in Nebula's vivisection.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Jan 5, 2021 23:07:06 GMT 1
I want Wonder Woman 3 to happen for the fans of the franchise. I hope it will be good.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 7, 2021 0:58:32 GMT 1
lol, oh yes I did. Hey, the girl in bed and possibly still actively having sex says "we should probably go figure out how a stone put my boyfriend back in another man's body". So she is straight up fully aware that they are using a complete stranger's body for sex, and at no point do they question this. Whether the guy's consciousness exists at that moment or not, they don't even hesitate. It's just A-OK. That is the single weirdest thing I've ever seen in a CBM. Nebula was distended apart for torture by her father.... Surely that was more invasive, unless handsome man is packing some serious heat. Thankfully was recognized as evil. The weirdness in the 84 scene isn’t so much that it happened, but that everybody just thinks it’s no big deal and just bang each other like it’s some kind of Quantum Leap fetish. Lol
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 8, 2021 11:21:22 GMT 1
Wait,,, there might be a speed bump to fast tracking this one
Doesn’t there now have to be a big tug of war for power over control of part 3?
Speaking objectively, WW84 is literally one vote away from having a rotten critic appraisal (yes I did the math), and it’s CinemaScore audience rating matches Justice League, so even if the new subscriptions justify the cost of doing more, they have to be seriously considering telling Patty she doesn’t get to write it. Don't they?
I don’t think she’ll stand for that though, soooo then what? Do they quietly part ways over creative differences? Are they back in another Snyder situation where they think her name value is worth more than the quality of the film and/or socially obligated by a contingent who want her to “finish her vision” no matter how bad it gets? I mean %#*!%@! if they are.
And another consideration is that 84 took awhile to come out, 3 years from start to finish, so they have to be second guessing if fast tracking will yield the best result right?
I just feel like these have to be major questions for the studio and I can’t imagine Patty giving in, so I don’t know what to expect here. I’m suspicious this is really on a fast track though, unless there was a board room meeting already took place and the answer to all of these was a resounding “ahhhhhh fk it”
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 8, 2021 17:45:31 GMT 1
Wait,,, there might be a speed bump to fast tracking this one Doesn’t there now have to be a big tug of war for power over control of part 3? Speaking objectively, WW84 is literally one vote away from having a rotten critic appraisal (yes I did the math), and it’s CinemaScore audience rating matches Justice League, so even if the new subscriptions justify the cost of doing more, they have to be seriously considering telling Patty she doesn’t get to write it. Don't they? I don’t think she’ll stand for that though, soooo then what? Do they quietly part ways over creative differences? Are they back in another Snyder situation where they think her name value is worth more than the quality of the film and/or socially obligated by a contingent who want her to “finish her vision” no matter how bad it gets? I mean %#*!%@! if they are. And another consideration is that 84 took awhile to come out, 3 years from start to finish, so they have to be second guessing if fast tracking will yield the best result right? I just feel like these have to be major questions for the studio and I can’t imagine Patty giving in, so I don’t know what to expect here. I’m suspicious this is really on a fast track though, unless there was a board room meeting already took place and the answer to all of these was a resounding “ahhhhhh fk it” WB's announcement about fast-tracking Wonder Woman is really smoke and mirrors. Please don't pay any attention to the executive behind the curtain. If Patty Jenkins makes both Cleopatra and Rogue Squadron first, the earliest we will ever see a Wonder Woman 3 is 2023, maybe 2024. Does that timeline sound like a fast track to you? Given how long it takes to prep and produce a Wonder Woman film, it could be longer. That is why I went out on a limb to say that if Patty is committed to Rogue Squadron, a massive sci-fi fantasy movie, and Cleopatra, a sweeping historical biopic, she may just have to give up Wonder Woman 3. I can't really comment on any internal power struggles amongst the principals and the studio. Still, I can say that this is another example of how WB's strategy is too reliant on star power. If this were Marvel, the Director would be dismissed and replaced (e.g., Derickson), and the show would go on. All I can say is that Jenkins will be in pre-prep purgatory for literally years to come.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 8, 2021 17:56:04 GMT 1
Great great points. I’ll file the “fast track” claim with WB’s seemingly magical great first reviews right before the bottom drops out. They are masters of the “nothing to see here” con
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on Jan 9, 2021 7:33:29 GMT 1
I’m curious if they’d introduce Donna Troy at all? As a potential replacement for Gadot whenever she’s decided to move on. Isn’t she the empath on Star Trek TNG? That^ was my first thought when I heard her name mentioned for the first time during Season 1 of Titans.
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Jones on Oct 15, 2021 23:38:36 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Jones on Oct 17, 2021 19:35:51 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Jones on Nov 10, 2021 19:45:15 GMT 1
Lynda Carter has been confirmed to return.
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Jones on Nov 29, 2021 23:23:31 GMT 1
Could be a team-up movie with Aquaman.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 30, 2021 3:45:02 GMT 1
Could be a team-up movie with Aquaman. Hera knows she needs it.
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on Dec 1, 2021 3:23:01 GMT 1
What she 'needs' is the winning combination of writers who wrote the first film (that managed to be very successful without it being a team-up movie) and for her third/potentially final film to focus on her character of Diana/Wonder Woman instead of revolving around a love interest or any other man. I was already robbed of a proper third Captain America movie with Civil War, and I don't want that happening here with WW.
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Jones on Jan 6, 2022 20:02:49 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 6, 2022 21:20:47 GMT 1
Nobody agrees with me on this but I’d replace Jenkins straight away. The first film gets treated like it’s genius but I said it then that there were some deeply troubling writing cracks everybody ignored and I think the even more Jenkins controlled 84’s chaotic result proves I was onto something. I really don’t know why it’s fashionable to keep insisting that directors of flailing franchises get to “finish their vision”, but I would be quite suspect of WW3 if I were you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2022 23:44:45 GMT 1
Nobody agrees with me on this but I’d replace Jenkins right away. The first film gets treated like it’s genius but I said it then that there were some deeply troubling writing cracks everybody ignored and I think the even more Jenkins controlled 84’s chaotic result proves I was onto something. I really don’t know why it’s fashionable to keep insisting that directors of flailing franchises get to “finish their vision”, but I would be quite suspect of WW3 if I were you. Actually I agree. Mostly. I do think the first one is pretty solid for a WW movie, and most of my issues with it are minor, having to more with the character and source material than the film. But… BUT… The more I think about WW84 the more I realize what a gigantic train wreck it was. Jenkins flat out ran what should have been one of DC’s tent poles right into the ground. How is she still in charge of it? Also, there’s really no getting around the fact that Gadot cannot act. She’s charming, but without Chris Pine even the first movie would’ve fallen flat.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 6, 2022 23:50:48 GMT 1
Nobody agrees with me on this but I’d replace Jenkins right away. The first film gets treated like it’s genius but I said it then that there were some deeply troubling writing cracks everybody ignored and I think the even more Jenkins controlled 84’s chaotic result proves I was onto something. I really don’t know why it’s fashionable to keep insisting that directors of flailing franchises get to “finish their vision”, but I would be quite suspect of WW3 if I were you. Actually I agree. Mostly. I do think the first one is pretty solid for a WW movie, and most of my issues with it are minor, having to more with the character and source material than the film. But… BUT… The more I think about WW84 the more I realize what a gigantic train wreck it was. Jenkins flat out ran what should have been one of DC’s tent poles right into the ground. How is she still in charge of it? Also, there’s really no getting around the fact that Gadot cannot act. She’s charming, but without Chris Pine even the first movie would’ve fallen flat. Yeah generally agree and I won’t harp on it but my two main things about the original are that WW doesn’t solve anything, she fails and gives up only for the villain to out himself. And no man’s land actually makes very little sense as it’s portrayed. She builds it up as impossible, but then they just walk through it in a minute with minimal resistance merely because Diana held a shield. That’s just not an impossible area to cross. It isn’t. It’s a poorly staged scene. But yeah for the most part aside from that, it’s ok. Those 2 things just struck me as things good writers would have noticed. 84 though, good grief. IDK what happened to that but everybody in creative should never come back the franchise. That was a narrative disaster. It gets saved by looking like a good film, but writing wise it’s some catwoman level BS.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2022 0:02:48 GMT 1
Actually I agree. Mostly. I do think the first one is pretty solid for a WW movie, and most of my issues with it are minor, having to more with the character and source material than the film. But… BUT… The more I think about WW84 the more I realize what a gigantic train wreck it was. Jenkins flat out ran what should have been one of DC’s tent poles right into the ground. How is she still in charge of it? Also, there’s really no getting around the fact that Gadot cannot act. She’s charming, but without Chris Pine even the first movie would’ve fallen flat. Yeah generally agree and I won’t harp on it but my two main things about the original are that WW doesn’t solve anything, she fails and gives up only for the villain to out himself. And no man’s land actually makes very little sense as it’s portrayed. She builds it up as impossible, but then they just walk through it in a minute with minimal resistance merely because Diana held a shield. That’s just not an impossible area to cross. It isn’t. It’s a poorly staged scene. But yeah for the most part aside from that, it’s ok. Those 2 things just struck me as things good writers would have noticed. 84 though, good grief. IDK what happened to that but everybody in creative should never come back the franchise. That was a narrative disaster. It gets saved by looking like a good film, but writing wise it’s some catwoman level BS. The No Man’s Land thing is a common complaint, but honestly, I think it’s a bit of a nitpick. I mean, it’s a comic movie and she’s freakin Wonder Woman. LOL. Might as well ask how Iron Man survived being smooshed by a moon on Titan. But I certainly admit that WW is far from perfect. I’ll say again that Gadot’s acting really brings it down. And the WW character is just kind of silly with a silly mythology of silly Greek gods.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jan 7, 2022 0:11:47 GMT 1
Yeah generally agree and I won’t harp on it but my two main things about the original are that WW doesn’t solve anything, she fails and gives up only for the villain to out himself. And no man’s land actually makes very little sense as it’s portrayed. She builds it up as impossible, but then they just walk through it in a minute with minimal resistance merely because Diana held a shield. That’s just not an impossible area to cross. It isn’t. It’s a poorly staged scene. But yeah for the most part aside from that, it’s ok. Those 2 things just struck me as things good writers would have noticed. 84 though, good grief. IDK what happened to that but everybody in creative should never come back the franchise. That was a narrative disaster. It gets saved by looking like a good film, but writing wise it’s some catwoman level BS. The No Man’s Land thing is a common complaint, but honestly, I think it’s a bit of a nitpick. I mean, it’s a comic movie and she’s freakin Wonder Woman. LOL. Might as well ask how Iron Man survived being smooshed by a moon on Titan. But I certainly admit that WW is far from perfect. I’ll say again that Gadot’s acting really brings it down. And the WW character is just kind of silly with a silly mythology of silly Greek gods. Well what I meant isn’t that WW is simply strong enough to win in minutes. That would be totally fine. It’s that the place wasn’t impossible to cross to begin with. It’s not the same question as Iron Man surviving. See what I mean?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2022 0:36:59 GMT 1
The No Man’s Land thing is a common complaint, but honestly, I think it’s a bit of a nitpick. I mean, it’s a comic movie and she’s freakin Wonder Woman. LOL. Might as well ask how Iron Man survived being smooshed by a moon on Titan. But I certainly admit that WW is far from perfect. I’ll say again that Gadot’s acting really brings it down. And the WW character is just kind of silly with a silly mythology of silly Greek gods. Well what I meant isn’t that WW is simply strong enough to win in minutes. That would be totally fine. It’s that the place wasn’t impossible to cross to begin with. It’s not the same question as Iron Man surviving. See what I mean? Kinda. I guess. I’m not one to really defend the movie anyway though. I just think it’s mostly solid, but not exceptional. I actually don’t know that I’ll ever feel like rewatching it knowing how bad the franchise became. I can’t really think about the Gadot version now without thinking of the garbage sequel. LOL
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Jones on Aug 9, 2022 15:55:02 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on Aug 9, 2022 22:48:00 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2022 2:26:00 GMT 1
All these^ negative comments regarding Wonder Woman/Gal Gadot Incoming Wonder Woman positivity in 5 4 3 2 1… Wonder Woman (2017) is still the best female led superhero movie of all time. Far better than Captain Marbles and Black Window.
|
|