Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2020 22:27:25 GMT 1
You can dream. I like the MCU SPider-Man films exactly the way they are. You can call me a dreamer. But I’m not the only one. Perhaps someday you’ll join us. And the world will live as one. And I'm not the only one that adores the MCU Spider-Man films exactly as they are. Both Homecoming and Far From Home are huge hit films that are highly rated by audiences and critics. Have you considered just skipping the third MCU Spider-Man film if you're so convinced you'll dislike it?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 13, 2020 23:08:56 GMT 1
You can call me a dreamer. But I’m not the only one. Perhaps someday you’ll join us. And the world will live as one. And I'm not the only one that adores the MCU Spider-Man films exactly as they are. Both Homecoming and Far From Home are huge hit films that are highly rated by audiences and critics. Have you considered just skipping the third MCU Spider-Man film if you're so convinced you'll dislike it? No, you're not. For the record, they're two of the finest films in the franchise. I don't see how anyone who hated the first two films is going to suddenly like the third one just because of a Director swap - gratuitous cameo-ing aside. It's not like the internals of the world will have changed, or the main actors will somehow become more appealing... or different... Hey, wait a minute...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2020 23:19:44 GMT 1
And I'm not the only one that adores the MCU Spider-Man films exactly as they are. Both Homecoming and Far From Home are huge hit films that are highly rated by audiences and critics. Have you considered just skipping the third MCU Spider-Man film if you're so convinced you'll dislike it? No, you're not. For the record, they're two of the finest films in the franchise. I don't see how anyone who hated the first two films is going to suddenly like the third one just because of a Director swap - gratuitous cameo-ing aside. It's not like the internals of the world will have changed, or the main actors will somehow become more appealing... or different... Hey, wait a minute... Director swap? Jon Watts is also directing Untitled Spider-Man 3. Did something happen while I wasn't looking. Yeah, and here's the thing. If Zandaya as MJ was as disliked the internet loves to try to say she is, she'd have already gone the way of Kat Dennings and that guy who played Ian sometime between Far From Home and now. But no, she's coming back for her third appearance.
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on Dec 13, 2020 23:30:34 GMT 1
No, you're not. For the record, they're two of the finest films in the franchise. I don't see how anyone who hated the first two films is going to suddenly like the third one just because of a Director swap - gratuitous cameo-ing aside. It's not like the internals of the world will have changed, or the main actors will somehow become more appealing... or different... Hey, wait a minute... Director swap? Jon Watts is also directing Untitled Spider-Man 3. Did something happen while I wasn't looking. Yeah, and here's the thing. If Zandaya as MJ was as disliked the internet loves to try to say she is, she'd have already gone the way of Kat Dennings and that guy who played Ian sometime between Far From Home and now. But no, she's coming back for her third appearance. I might be mistaken, but it seems like quite a lot of people weren't that fond of Jane Foster...but she's returning to the Thor films. So being 'disliked' doesn't seem to automatically mean you won't be in further films. Kate Dennings mightn't be in the films anymore, but she's going to be in WandaVision, so her character hasn't been 'retired' or anything. I don't think she wasn't in the third Thor movie because people hated her, it was more just that the writers/director wanted to take the films in a completely different direction to the first two (at least that's how it seemed to me). And just to clarify, I never said that everyone hates Michelle. I'm well aware there are a lot of people who like her...I just don't get why, as I'm not one of those people. And no change of director will make me want to see the movie at the theatre or on DVD. I'll be waiting for it to appear on TV and will record it to watch just as I did with SMH. Anyway, it's clear that I hold the 'unpopular' opinion here, and I'm not trying to change anyone else's opinion either, I was just attempting to explain why I'm not a fan of Michelle (which I have done).
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 13, 2020 23:37:22 GMT 1
No, you're not. For the record, they're two of the finest films in the franchise. I don't see how anyone who hated the first two films is going to suddenly like the third one just because of a Director swap - gratuitous cameo-ing aside. It's not like the internals of the world will have changed, or the main actors will somehow become more appealing... or different... Hey, wait a minute... Director swap? Jon Watts is also directing Untitled Spider-Man 3. Did something happen while I wasn't looking. Yeah, and here's the thing. If Zandaya as MJ was as disliked the internet loves to try to say she is, she'd have already gone the way of Kat Dennings and that guy who played Ian sometime between Far From Home and now. But no, she's coming back for her third appearance. I thought Watts was moving out of the slot with F4? Is he doing both?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2020 23:40:52 GMT 1
Director swap? Jon Watts is also directing Untitled Spider-Man 3. Did something happen while I wasn't looking. Yeah, and here's the thing. If Zandaya as MJ was as disliked the internet loves to try to say she is, she'd have already gone the way of Kat Dennings and that guy who played Ian sometime between Far From Home and now. But no, she's coming back for her third appearance. I might be mistaken, but it seems like quite a lot of people weren't that fond of Jane Foster...but she's returning to the Thor films. So being 'disliked' doesn't seem to automatically mean you won't be in further films. Kate Dennings mightn't be in the films anymore, but she's going to be in WandaVision, so her character hasn't been 'retired' or anything. I don't think she wasn't in the third Thor movie because people hated her, it was more just that the writers/director wanted to take the films in a completely different direction to the first two (at least that's how it seemed to me). And just to clarify, I never said that everyone hates Michelle. I'm well aware there are a lot of people who like her...I just don't get why, as I'm not one of those people. And no change of director will make me want to see the movie at the theatre or on DVD. I'll be waiting for it to appear on TV and will record it to watch just as I did with SMH. Anyway, it's clear that I hold the 'unpopular' opinion here, and I'm not trying to change anyone else's opinion either, I was just attempting to explain why I'm not a fan of Michelle (which I have done). I don't think many people dislike Jane, despite the noise the internet made. I think most are so-so with her, because that is certainly the opinion I got outside of message boards. Kat Dennings is a surprise, though. Fair enough for the rest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2020 23:41:19 GMT 1
Director swap? Jon Watts is also directing Untitled Spider-Man 3. Did something happen while I wasn't looking. Yeah, and here's the thing. If Zandaya as MJ was as disliked the internet loves to try to say she is, she'd have already gone the way of Kat Dennings and that guy who played Ian sometime between Far From Home and now. But no, she's coming back for her third appearance. I thought Watts was moving out of the slot with F4? Is he doing both? He is doing both.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2020 23:46:24 GMT 1
You can call me a dreamer. But I’m not the only one. Perhaps someday you’ll join us. And the world will live as one. And I'm not the only one that adores the MCU Spider-Man films exactly as they are. Both Homecoming and Far From Home are huge hit films that are highly rated by audiences and critics. Have you considered just skipping the third MCU Spider-Man film if you're so convinced you'll dislike it? Ok, the original post about MJ was just a fun little joke for @shadowbiz and Chalice_Of_Evil The last post was a quote from John Lennon. (It’s his 80th b day today). This wasn’t meant to be a big debate or anything.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 13, 2020 23:47:04 GMT 1
I thought Watts was moving out of the slot with F4? Is he doing both? He is doing both. Ah, so much information from the ID content bomb. I was bound to louse something up. Thanks, I stand corrected.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2020 23:48:39 GMT 1
No, you're not. For the record, they're two of the finest films in the franchise. I don't see how anyone who hated the first two films is going to suddenly like the third one just because of a Director swap - gratuitous cameo-ing aside. It's not like the internals of the world will have changed, or the main actors will somehow become more appealing... or different... Hey, wait a minute... Director swap? Jon Watts is also directing Untitled Spider-Man 3. Did something happen while I wasn't looking. Yeah, and here's the thing. If Zandaya as MJ was as disliked the internet loves to try to say she is, she'd have already gone the way of Kat Dennings and that guy who played Ian sometime between Far From Home and now. But no, she's coming back for her third appearance. He/She is just getting off on you disagreeing with me. LOL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 0:04:17 GMT 1
For what it’s worth I actually like Homecoming. And the multiverse idea intrigues me quite a bit. I may well end up enjoying this movie more than some of the more hardcore MCU fans. Would that blow some minds?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 0:34:15 GMT 1
And I'm not the only one that adores the MCU Spider-Man films exactly as they are. Both Homecoming and Far From Home are huge hit films that are highly rated by audiences and critics. Have you considered just skipping the third MCU Spider-Man film if you're so convinced you'll dislike it? Ok, the original post about MJ was just a fun little joke for @shadowbiz and Chalice_Of_Evil The last post was a quote from John Lennon. (It’s his 80th b day today). This wasn’t meant to be a big debate or anything. Fair enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 0:45:25 GMT 1
And I'm not the only one that adores the MCU Spider-Man films exactly as they are. Both Homecoming and Far From Home are huge hit films that are highly rated by audiences and critics. Have you considered just skipping the third MCU Spider-Man film if you're so convinced you'll dislike it? Ok, the original post about MJ was just a fun little joke for @shadowbiz and Chalice_Of_Evil The last post was a quote from John Lennon. (It’s his 80th b day today). This wasn’t meant to be a big debate or anything. Not to me. I dislike the ho
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Dec 14, 2020 1:00:04 GMT 1
If we're really getting multiple Spider-mans I wonder if we're going to get a cameo from Miles Morales?
Between the animated film and the recent game he's definitely gotten a lot of exposure from the public.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 2:04:07 GMT 1
For what it’s worth I actually like Homecoming. And the multiverse idea intrigues me quite a bit. I may well end up enjoying this movie more than some of the more hardcore MCU fans. Would that blow some minds? My main thing here is that I have little patience for talk about changing the current MCU Spider-Man films, because there are already other Spider-Man films done differently than these. I understand you were joking now. Just let me explain, I'm very protective of the MCU Spider-Man (thus far) incomplete trilogy, because I finally have Spider-Man films I wholeheartedly like, and I want a whole Spider-Man trilogy that I like. You already have the Raimi trilogy, but I don't have a Spider-Man trilogy to call my own yet. I was digging The Amazing Spider-Man until they blew it with 2, but I also dig the MCU Spidey films, thankfully. Believe me, I was prepared not to, because I was once so angry about the firing of Andrew Garfield that, well... Tom Holland is lucky there was a several month gap between the announcement of his casting and his first appearance. I'd had time to cool down and tell myself I was going to give him a chance. And then I ended up liking him a lot. So yeah, after a trilogy I never liked and a reboot I did like that failed, I'm a little prickly and quick to angry when it comes to MCU Spider-Man.
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on Dec 14, 2020 2:13:43 GMT 1
For what it’s worth I actually like Homecoming. And the multiverse idea intrigues me quite a bit. I may well end up enjoying this movie more than some of the more hardcore MCU fans. Would that blow some minds? My main thing here is that I have little patience for talk about changing the current MCU Spider-Man films, because there are already other Spider-Man films done differently than these. I understand you were joking now. Just let me explain, I'm very protective of the MCU Spider-Man (thus far) incomplete trilogy, because I finally have Spider-Man films I wholeheartedly like, and I want a whole Spider-Man trilogy that I like. You already have the Raimi trilogy, but I don't have a Spider-Man trilogy to call my own yet. I was digging The Amazing Spider-Man until they blew it with 2, but I also dig the MCU Spidey films, thankfully. Believe me, I was prepared not to, because I was once so angry about the firing of Andrew Garfield that, well... Tom Holland is lucky there was a several month gap between the announcement of his casting and his first appearance. I'd had time to cool down and tell myself I was going to give him a chance. And then I ended up liking him a lot. So yeah, after a trilogy I never liked and a reboot I did like that failed, I'm a little prickly and quick to angry when it comes to MCU Spider-Man. It's good you have SM films you like, weirdraptor. As you said, there's Raimi's films for people who prefer those ones, there's the MCU films for those who like them (such as yourself) and I'm in my own little corner having liked the two TASM films the best (yes, even the second). I just don't think I'm a fan of Spider-Man in general, since the only version I've liked is the one a lot of other people didn't seem to. None of his interpretations have ever been a 'favourite' of mine, though I tolerated the Andrew Garfield version the best. Any way, I think it's a good thing that everyone can have their own version that they like (maybe some even like all three versions?), but maybe there's just not been a version made as yet for some people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 2:28:58 GMT 1
My main thing here is that I have little patience for talk about changing the current MCU Spider-Man films, because there are already other Spider-Man films done differently than these. I understand you were joking now. Just let me explain, I'm very protective of the MCU Spider-Man (thus far) incomplete trilogy, because I finally have Spider-Man films I wholeheartedly like, and I want a whole Spider-Man trilogy that I like. You already have the Raimi trilogy, but I don't have a Spider-Man trilogy to call my own yet. I was digging The Amazing Spider-Man until they blew it with 2, but I also dig the MCU Spidey films, thankfully. Believe me, I was prepared not to, because I was once so angry about the firing of Andrew Garfield that, well... Tom Holland is lucky there was a several month gap between the announcement of his casting and his first appearance. I'd had time to cool down and tell myself I was going to give him a chance. And then I ended up liking him a lot. So yeah, after a trilogy I never liked and a reboot I did like that failed, I'm a little prickly and quick to angry when it comes to MCU Spider-Man. It's good you have SM films you like, weirdraptor. As you said, there's Raimi's films for people who prefer those ones, there's the MCU films for those who like them (such as yourself) and I'm in my own little corner having liked the two TASM films the best (yes, even the second). I just don't think I'm a fan of Spider-Man in general, since the only version I've liked is the one a lot of other people didn't seem to. None of his interpretations have ever been a 'favourite' of mine, though I tolerated the Andrew Garfield version the best. Any way, I think it's a good thing that everyone can have their own version that they like (maybe some even like all three versions?), but maybe there's just not been a version made as yet for some people. Exactly. And holy moly, I am glad to finally not have an explanation demanded of me when I say I never liked the Raimi films. So thank you. Side note: I do like Sam Raimi as a filmmaker, just not his Spider-Man films. And I'm actually in that corner with you, because I absolutely love The Amazing Spider-Man. I also like 2, but alas, what happened happened. While I don't like the circumstances that brought about Holland's Spider-Man, I understand the dude was only 19 at the time and probably had no idea what went down behind the scenes with the Amazing films at the time. Sony is totally the one to blame for that. Hey, if the Spider-Man films aren't exactly your thing, the character has had some really good animated series about him that I think actually outmatch any of the films in terms of storytelling and faithfulness to the comics. If you're ever curious to check them out, I'd highly recommend the 90s Spider-Man: The Animated Series (I have no idea why it was called that, because there was no live-action counterpart at the time. We just kinda go with it) and The Spectacular Spider-Man.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 14, 2020 2:37:35 GMT 1
My main thing here is that I have little patience for talk about changing the current MCU Spider-Man films, because there are already other Spider-Man films done differently than these. I understand you were joking now. Just let me explain, I'm very protective of the MCU Spider-Man (thus far) incomplete trilogy, because I finally have Spider-Man films I wholeheartedly like, and I want a whole Spider-Man trilogy that I like. You already have the Raimi trilogy, but I don't have a Spider-Man trilogy to call my own yet. I was digging The Amazing Spider-Man until they blew it with 2, but I also dig the MCU Spidey films, thankfully. Believe me, I was prepared not to, because I was once so angry about the firing of Andrew Garfield that, well... Tom Holland is lucky there was a several month gap between the announcement of his casting and his first appearance. I'd had time to cool down and tell myself I was going to give him a chance. And then I ended up liking him a lot. So yeah, after a trilogy I never liked and a reboot I did like that failed, I'm a little prickly and quick to angry when it comes to MCU Spider-Man. It's good you have SM films you like, weirdraptor. As you said, there's Raimi's films for people who prefer those ones, there's the MCU films for those who like them (such as yourself) and I'm in my own little corner having liked the two TASM films the best (yes, even the second). I just don't think I'm a fan of Spider-Man in general, since the only version I've liked is the one a lot of other people didn't seem to. None of his interpretations have ever been a 'favourite' of mine, though I tolerated the Andrew Garfield version the best. Any way, I think it's a good thing that everyone can have their own version that they like (maybe some even like all three versions?), but maybe there's just not been a version made as yet for some people. Well said, and sad to say that the Raimi diehard community has forced me to revise my opinion of those films downward. No love lost though... Glad the revered elders have something they can point to as definitive for their time, but those films are decidedly in my rearview... I would not want to go back to that style or take on the character, but I am glad that the contributions of that era in advancing the medium are being recognized in Spider-Man 3. I can take or leave the Amazing Spider-Man films. They're perfectly inoffensive outside of Garfield's weird cockiness and the sheer number of unfulfilled dangles, but they're not very memorable to me. The plot to both movies frequently blurs together in my mind. Love the new duo of films, and maybe they are imperfect if you're intent on lint picking, but... the Ramones though... and smash cuts. Yah.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 2:39:00 GMT 1
For what it’s worth I actually like Homecoming. And the multiverse idea intrigues me quite a bit. I may well end up enjoying this movie more than some of the more hardcore MCU fans. Would that blow some minds? My main thing here is that I have little patience for talk about changing the current MCU Spider-Man films, because there are already other Spider-Man films done differently than these. I understand you were joking now. Just let me explain, I'm very protective of the MCU Spider-Man (thus far) incomplete trilogy, because I finally have Spider-Man films I wholeheartedly like, and I want a whole Spider-Man trilogy that I like. You already have the Raimi trilogy, but I don't have a Spider-Man trilogy to call my own yet. I was digging The Amazing Spider-Man until they blew it with 2, but I also dig the MCU Spidey films, thankfully. Believe me, I was prepared not to, because I was once so angry about the firing of Andrew Garfield that, well... Tom Holland is lucky there was a several month gap between the announcement of his casting and his first appearance. I'd had time to cool down and tell myself I was going to give him a chance. And then I ended up liking him a lot. So yeah, after a trilogy I never liked and a reboot I did like that failed, I'm a little prickly and quick to angry when it comes to MCU Spider-Man. No, I get it. And I hope you end up liking part 3 of the trilogy. Raimi fans aren’t unfamiliar with a disappointing part three though. I mean, I’ve grown to enjoy to Spider-Man 3 for what it is. But it’s still a big disappointment compared to the first two. Perhaps our dear Spidey is doomed to never have a full trilogy that satisfies his many fans.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 14, 2020 2:40:22 GMT 1
It's good you have SM films you like, weirdraptor. As you said, there's Raimi's films for people who prefer those ones, there's the MCU films for those who like them (such as yourself) and I'm in my own little corner having liked the two TASM films the best (yes, even the second). I just don't think I'm a fan of Spider-Man in general, since the only version I've liked is the one a lot of other people didn't seem to. None of his interpretations have ever been a 'favourite' of mine, though I tolerated the Andrew Garfield version the best. Any way, I think it's a good thing that everyone can have their own version that they like (maybe some even like all three versions?), but maybe there's just not been a version made as yet for some people. Exactly. And holy moly, I am glad to finally not have an explanation demanded of me when I say I never liked the Raimi films. So thank you. Side note: I do like Sam Raimi as a filmmaker, just not his Spider-Man films. And I'm actually in that corner with you, because I absolutely love The Amazing Spider-Man. I also like 2, but alas, what happened happened. While I don't like the circumstances that brought about Holland's Spider-Man, I understand the dude was only 19 at the time and probably had no idea what went down behind the scenes with the Amazing films at the time. Sony is totally the one to blame for that. Hey, if the Spider-Man films aren't exactly your thing, the character has had some really good animated series about him that I think actually outmatch any of the films in terms of storytelling and faithfulness to the comics. If you're ever curious to check them out, I'd highly recommend the 90s Spider-Man: The Animated Series (I have no idea why it was called that, because there was no live-action counterpart at the time. We just kinda go with it) and The Spectacular Spider-Man. Dude, so harsh. I prefer to say I outgrew them instead.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 2:47:41 GMT 1
My main thing here is that I have little patience for talk about changing the current MCU Spider-Man films, because there are already other Spider-Man films done differently than these. I understand you were joking now. Just let me explain, I'm very protective of the MCU Spider-Man (thus far) incomplete trilogy, because I finally have Spider-Man films I wholeheartedly like, and I want a whole Spider-Man trilogy that I like. You already have the Raimi trilogy, but I don't have a Spider-Man trilogy to call my own yet. I was digging The Amazing Spider-Man until they blew it with 2, but I also dig the MCU Spidey films, thankfully. Believe me, I was prepared not to, because I was once so angry about the firing of Andrew Garfield that, well... Tom Holland is lucky there was a several month gap between the announcement of his casting and his first appearance. I'd had time to cool down and tell myself I was going to give him a chance. And then I ended up liking him a lot. So yeah, after a trilogy I never liked and a reboot I did like that failed, I'm a little prickly and quick to angry when it comes to MCU Spider-Man. No, I get it. And I hope you end up liking part 3 of the trilogy. Raimi fans aren’t unfamiliar with a disappointing part three though. I mean, I’ve grown to enjoy to Spider-Man 3 for what it is. But it’s still a big disappointment compared to the first two. Perhaps our dear Spidey is doomed to never have a full trilogy that satisfies his many fans. Thanks. Yeah it does sound like they're making the exact same mistakes the previous Spider-Man 3 did, doesn't it? I... I mean... Spider-Man is finally a full-on fugitive in one of these after two big screen incarnations flirting with the idea but never quite going the full distance with it. Why is that not enough? I've come around to deciding to give it a chance, but I'm really struggling to figure out how they're going to begin, develop, and end the fugitive storyline AND have this many villains and potentially have other Spider-Men all in one movie. Unless they don't intend to conclude the fugitive story arc in just one film, which is certainly something they can choose to keep going for a few entries. Heck, maybe his part in The Avengers 5 is when he finally clears his name.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 2:49:49 GMT 1
Exactly. And holy moly, I am glad to finally not have an explanation demanded of me when I say I never liked the Raimi films. So thank you. Side note: I do like Sam Raimi as a filmmaker, just not his Spider-Man films. And I'm actually in that corner with you, because I absolutely love The Amazing Spider-Man. I also like 2, but alas, what happened happened. While I don't like the circumstances that brought about Holland's Spider-Man, I understand the dude was only 19 at the time and probably had no idea what went down behind the scenes with the Amazing films at the time. Sony is totally the one to blame for that. Hey, if the Spider-Man films aren't exactly your thing, the character has had some really good animated series about him that I think actually outmatch any of the films in terms of storytelling and faithfulness to the comics. If you're ever curious to check them out, I'd highly recommend the 90s Spider-Man: The Animated Series (I have no idea why it was called that, because there was no live-action counterpart at the time. We just kinda go with it) and The Spectacular Spider-Man. Dude, so harsh. I prefer to say I outgrew them instead. Just being honest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 3:11:49 GMT 1
If we're really getting multiple Spider-mans I wonder if we're going to get a cameo from Miles Morales? Between the animated film and the recent game he's definitely gotten a lot of exposure from the public. I wouldn't be surprised if it's more than a cameo. I could see him becoming a full on supporting character.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 3:26:35 GMT 1
If we're really getting multiple Spider-mans I wonder if we're going to get a cameo from Miles Morales? Between the animated film and the recent game he's definitely gotten a lot of exposure from the public. I wouldn't be surprised if it's more than a cameo. I could see him becoming a full on supporting character. If they do, that's going to put Marvel Studios in a weird position. They end up with two guys with the exact same powers, and they're both too popular to get rid of one of them. Have fun sorting that one, Feige.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 4:34:35 GMT 1
I wouldn't be surprised if it's more than a cameo. I could see him becoming a full on supporting character. If they do, that's going to put Marvel Studios in a weird position. They end up with two guys with the exact same powers, and they're both too popular to get rid of one of them. Have fun sorting that one, Feige. Yeah, that perfectly explains why I never liked Miles. A Spider-Man side kick sounds like a good idea (though he’s probably viewed as more of a replacement/alternate) but since he has the exact same powers he becomes instantly redundant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 4:38:46 GMT 1
If they do, that's going to put Marvel Studios in a weird position. They end up with two guys with the exact same powers, and they're both too popular to get rid of one of them. Have fun sorting that one, Feige. Yeah, that perfectly explains why I never liked Miles. A Spider-Man side kick sounds like a good idea (though he’s probably viewed as more of a replacement/alternate) but since he has the exact same powers he becomes instantly redundant. Making Miles Peter's black sidekick in THIS political climate right now? They'd be shooting themselves in the legs from the amount of Hell certain "outspoken" individuals would raise over it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 6:58:25 GMT 1
Yeah, that perfectly explains why I never liked Miles. A Spider-Man side kick sounds like a good idea (though he’s probably viewed as more of a replacement/alternate) but since he has the exact same powers he becomes instantly redundant. Making Miles Peter's black sidekick in THIS political climate right now? They'd be shooting themselves in the legs from the amount of Hell certain "outspoken" individuals would raise over it. I don’t know. No one complained about Sam or Rhodey. Besides as I said, side kick is not really what he is anyway. I’m sure they would portray him as more of a co-Spider-Man? I don’t know. We’ll see if he’s even in it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2020 7:08:43 GMT 1
Making Miles Peter's black sidekick in THIS political climate right now? They'd be shooting themselves in the legs from the amount of Hell certain "outspoken" individuals would raise over it. I don’t know. No one complained about Sam or Rhodey. Besides as I said, side kick is not really what he is anyway. I’m sure they would portray him as more of a co-Spider-Man? I don’t know. We’ll see if he’s even in it. Sam and Rhody got out from under a white man's shadow before things got really aggressive with the race politics this year. Miles would be coming in under current politics conditions. I hope he doesn't show. I really don't.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Dec 15, 2020 0:46:16 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by AQUA JAR!™ on Dec 15, 2020 1:02:20 GMT 1
|
|