|
Post by Grandmaster on Dec 8, 2020 22:21:13 GMT 1
That Sony deal gets more awful by the minute.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2020 22:40:38 GMT 1
That Sony deal gets more awful by the minute.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Dec 9, 2020 16:38:53 GMT 1
This is slowly becoming the worst CBM of all time if all the rumors are true....
|
|
|
Post by AQUA JAR!™ on Dec 9, 2020 18:15:58 GMT 1
This is slowly becoming the worst CBM of all time if all the rumors are true.... Why? Spiderverse had the same premise, and it was one of the best.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Dec 9, 2020 18:36:11 GMT 1
This is slowly becoming the worst CBM of all time if all the rumors are true.... Why? Spiderverse had the same premise, and it was one of the best. Because its all I absolutely dont want to happen. Im very anxious about this movie and what it will do to my personal enjoyment of the MCU going forward.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2020 19:19:07 GMT 1
I really doubt the theory that Sony is behind these choices. What do they have to gain from putting characters from defunct franchises into this? They would’ve forced in Tom Hardy’s Venom and Leto’s Morbius if they had that kind of power.
No, this is clearly a Feige decision. I think he A) Wants to have the multiverse effect more than just Dr Strange’s corner of the MCU. B) Wants to do a live action Spideyverse after the success of the the animated one. C) Feige probably knows that the Holland Spider-Man franchise is in need of a bit of a shakeup. Iron Man is no longer there to shoulder the load so they’re bring in Dr Strange and some of the classic Spidey actors to generate more interest from Spidey fans.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Dec 9, 2020 19:23:16 GMT 1
I really doubt the theory that Sony is behind these choices. What do they have to gain from putting characters from defunct franchises into this? They would’ve forced in Tom Hardy’s Venom and Leto’s Morbius if they had that kind of power. No, this is clearly a Feige decision. I think he A) Wants to have the multiverse effect more than just Dr Strange’s corner of the MCU. B) Wants to do a live action Spideyverse after the success of the the animated one. C) Feige probably knows that the Holland Spider-Man franchise is in need of a bit of a shakeup. Iron Man is no longer there to shoulder the load so they’re bring in Dr Strange and some of the classic Spidey actors to generate more interest from Spidey fans. The last film made more than a billion dollars. How can you say it needs a shake up and more attention? This is all 'fan' service and it smells like Sony.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2020 19:25:22 GMT 1
I really doubt the theory that Sony is behind these choices. What do they have to gain from putting characters from defunct franchises into this? They would’ve forced in Tom Hardy’s Venom and Leto’s Morbius if they had that kind of power. No, this is clearly a Feige decision. I think he A) Wants to have the multiverse effect more than just Dr Strange’s corner of the MCU. B) Wants to do a live action Spideyverse after the success of the the animated one. C) Feige probably knows that the Holland Spider-Man franchise is in need of a bit of a shakeup. Iron Man is no longer there to shoulder the load so they’re bring in Dr Strange and some of the classic Spidey actors to generate more interest from Spidey fans. The last film made more than a billion dollars. How can you say it needs a shake up and more attention? This is all 'fan' service and it smells like Sony. I just don’t see why everyone assumes that it’s Sony. They don’t gain from putting in older versions of characters. They would’ve forced Venom in if they had their way.
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Jones on Dec 9, 2020 19:33:09 GMT 1
The last film made more than a billion dollars. How can you say it needs a shake up and more attention? This is all 'fan' service and it smells like Sony. I just don’t see why everyone assumes that it’s Sony. They don’t gain from putting in older versions of characters. They would’ve forced Venom in if they had their way. Oh well that’s for the post-credit scene.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2020 20:52:40 GMT 1
I just don’t see why everyone assumes that it’s Sony. They don’t gain from putting in older versions of characters. They would’ve forced Venom in if they had their way. Oh well that’s for the post-credit scene. Post credit scenes should feature Rosemary Harris and Sally Field! Into the Auntee-Verse!
|
|
|
Post by AQUA JAR!™ on Dec 9, 2020 20:54:56 GMT 1
Oh well that’s for the post-credit scene. Post credit scenes should feature Rosemary Harris and Sally Field! Into the Auntee-Verse!
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Dec 10, 2020 0:33:42 GMT 1
Charlie Cox is now rumored to return as Daredevil for this film.
If any of this happens this will be my most anticipated phase 4 film.
|
|
|
Post by AQUA KEN! on Dec 10, 2020 0:36:23 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 10, 2020 3:25:58 GMT 1
My god... he's going to go all the way, isn't he? He's not content to imperil worlds, galaxies, or even a single universe. He's going to recombine ALL of the universes. And the prince of the MCU, his royal majesty, the amazing Spider-Man, will herald the change. This. Is. Madness. But I see it so clearly now, Spider-Man 3 will make it so that all of the boundaries between Marvel IP, across studios, are broken wide open. Forever. RIP to the retcon. Death to continuity. That baseball cap might as well be a helmet with a tactical display. Yes, indeed, "this is the way."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:32:45 GMT 1
I really doubt the theory that Sony is behind these choices. What do they have to gain from putting characters from defunct franchises into this? They would’ve forced in Tom Hardy’s Venom and Leto’s Morbius if they had that kind of power. No, this is clearly a Feige decision. I think he A) Wants to have the multiverse effect more than just Dr Strange’s corner of the MCU. B) Wants to do a live action Spideyverse after the success of the the animated one. C) Feige probably knows that the Holland Spider-Man franchise is in need of a bit of a shakeup. Iron Man is no longer there to shoulder the load so they’re bring in Dr Strange and some of the classic Spidey actors to generate more interest from Spidey fans. But the Spiderverse film wasn't that big of a success. Everything about "C" is bullshit, because once again, "Far from Home" made WAY more money than anything Sony has put out in a long, long time. And the shakeup already happened at the end of "Far From Home".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:33:35 GMT 1
The last film made more than a billion dollars. How can you say it needs a shake up and more attention? This is all 'fan' service and it smells like Sony. I just don’t see why everyone assumes that it’s Sony. They don’t gain from putting in older versions of characters. They would’ve forced Venom in if they had their way. Because it's a bad idea, and Sony is full of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:35:16 GMT 1
My god... he's going to go all the way, isn't he? He's not content to imperil worlds, galaxies, or even a single universe. He's going to recombine ALL of the universes. And the prince of the MCU, his royal majesty, the amazing Spider-Man, will herald the change. This. Is. Madness. But I see it so clearly now, Spider-Man 3 will make it so that all of the boundaries between Marvel IP, across studios, are broken wide open. Forever. RIP to the retcon. Death to continuity. That baseball cap might as well be a helmet with a tactical display. Yes, indeed, "this is the way." Why would Feige do this when the MCU is clearly superior to all the other defunct Marvel movie universes? This makes no sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:36:02 GMT 1
I just don’t see why everyone assumes that it’s Sony. They don’t gain from putting in older versions of characters. They would’ve forced Venom in if they had their way. Because it's a bad idea, and Sony is full of them. But Garfield and MacGuire are also rumored for Dr Strange, which Scott Derrickson all but confirmed by tweeting that the old Spidey films are mcu canon. Sony has no influence over Dr Strange. Like or not, this is almost certainly Feige’s idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:37:56 GMT 1
Because it's a bad idea, and Sony is full of them. But Garfield and MacGuire are also rumored for Dr Strange, which Scott Derrickson all but confirmed by tweeting that the old Spidey films are mcu canon. Sony has no influence over Dr Strange. Like or not, this is almost certainly Feige’s idea. Then Feige is finally losing his grip and the bad decisions are finally starting to roll in.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:42:50 GMT 1
But Garfield and MacGuire are also rumored for Dr Strange, which Scott Derrickson all but confirmed by tweeting that the old Spidey films are mcu canon. Sony has no influence over Dr Strange. Like or not, this is almost certainly Feige’s idea. Then Feige is finally losing his grip and the bad decisions are finally starting to roll in. It was inevitable, I suppose. Perhaps he’s gone mad with power.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:46:16 GMT 1
Then Feige is finally losing his grip and the bad decisions are finally starting to roll in. It was inevitable, I suppose. Perhaps he’s gone mad with power. It was never inevitable. He had a carefully constructed universe and the most successful franchise on planet Earth. Now he's throwing all that hard work away for nothing. This is a spit in the face of every actor, filmmaker, and other artist who ever worked on the MCU. So many people had to make these films in such a way that they fit into the setting, and now apparently all that work was for nothing, since apparently there will be no internal consistency or continuity anymore. They've just ruined it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:52:50 GMT 1
It was inevitable, I suppose. Perhaps he’s gone mad with power. It was never inevitable. He had a carefully constructed universe and the most successful franchise on planet Earth. Now he's throwing all that hard work away for nothing. This is a spit in the face of every actor, filmmaker, and other artist who ever worked on the MCU. So many people had to make these films in such a way that they fit into the setting, and now apparently all that work was for nothing, since apparently there will be no internal consistency or continuity anymore. They've just ruined it. I wonder if Disney will force Feige to resign.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:55:07 GMT 1
It was never inevitable. He had a carefully constructed universe and the most successful franchise on planet Earth. Now he's throwing all that hard work away for nothing. This is a spit in the face of every actor, filmmaker, and other artist who ever worked on the MCU. So many people had to make these films in such a way that they fit into the setting, and now apparently all that work was for nothing, since apparently there will be no internal consistency or continuity anymore. They've just ruined it. I wonder if Disney will force Feige to resign. I can't tell if you're taking this seriously or not. All I do know is that the MCU might be about to kill itself with some very questionable decisions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 3:59:12 GMT 1
I wonder if Disney will force Feige to resign. I can't tell if you're taking this seriously or not. All I do know is that the MCU might be about to kill itself with some very questionable decisions. I do honestly think it’s a really bizarre approach to Spider-Man 3. Even as a big Raimi fan I don’t really care about seeing the characters return in a multiverse movie. Seems really dumb to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 4:02:16 GMT 1
I can't tell if you're taking this seriously or not. All I do know is that the MCU might be about to kill itself with some very questionable decisions. I do honestly think it’s a really bizarre approach to Spider-Man 3. Even as a big Raimi fan I don’t really care about seeing the characters return in a multiverse movie. Seems really dumb to me. I wish I knew what was motivating this. Like, is WB/DC's attempt at nostalgia-pandering with Keaton's Batman really that much of a threat? From where I'm sitting, both Flashpoint and whatever the MCU has out at about that time would both probably be hits. Marvel and DC both making movies have never stopped either one from being successful if they're both good before.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 4:04:26 GMT 1
I do honestly think it’s a really bizarre approach to Spider-Man 3. Even as a big Raimi fan I don’t really care about seeing the characters return in a multiverse movie. Seems really dumb to me. I wish I knew what was motivating this. Like, is WB/DC's attempt at nostalgia-pandering with Keaton's Batman really that much of a threat? From where I'm sitting, both Flashpoint and whatever the MCU has out at about that time would both probably be hits. Marvel and DC both making movies have never stopped either one from being successful if they're both good before. My guess is this: they wanted the multiverse to impact the MCU beyond Dr Strange 2, but didn’t want it to effect the entire phase of movies. So their answer was to do a Spiderverse live action movie with Dr Strange in it to end the mini multiverse arc that begins in Dr Strange 2. It kind of makes sense in a way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 4:16:13 GMT 1
I wish I knew what was motivating this. Like, is WB/DC's attempt at nostalgia-pandering with Keaton's Batman really that much of a threat? From where I'm sitting, both Flashpoint and whatever the MCU has out at about that time would both probably be hits. Marvel and DC both making movies have never stopped either one from being successful if they're both good before. My guess is this: they wanted the multiverse to impact the MCU beyond Dr Strange 2, but didn’t want it to effect the entire phase of movies. So their answer was to do a Spiderverse live action movie with Dr Strange in it to end the mini multiverse arc that begins in Dr Strange 2. It kind of makes sense in a way. In that case, it still sounds like they're missing the mark. What people liked about "Spiderverse" was that it was different. You got to see obscure, rarely seen versions of Spider-Man, but it was still ultimately the story of the main Spider-Man you started with in the film (Miles). This just sounds like pandering of the worst kind. Now the idea of a Spiderverse movie isn't new anymore, and they're going to show us versions of Peter Parker we're already familiar with. If they were more serious about this, they could get the companies behind the Japanese versions of Spider-Man on the phone and see about crossing them over with Holland!Peter, instead. That'd at least be more in line with the kind of weirdness the MCU has become known for.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 10, 2020 4:18:45 GMT 1
My god... he's going to go all the way, isn't he? He's not content to imperil worlds, galaxies, or even a single universe. He's going to recombine ALL of the universes. And the prince of the MCU, his royal majesty, the amazing Spider-Man, will herald the change. This. Is. Madness. But I see it so clearly now, Spider-Man 3 will make it so that all of the boundaries between Marvel IP, across studios, are broken wide open. Forever. RIP to the retcon. Death to continuity. That baseball cap might as well be a helmet with a tactical display. Yes, indeed, "this is the way." Why would Feige do this when the MCU is clearly superior to all the other defunct Marvel movie universes? This makes no sense. Because... He can.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 4:20:13 GMT 1
Why would Feige do this when the MCU is clearly superior to all the other defunct Marvel movie universes? This makes no sense. Because... He can. He can, and it might kill the MCU. Not for just a few fans, either. I'm talking about a total collapse.
|
|
|
Post by Grandmaster on Dec 10, 2020 7:28:50 GMT 1
Because it's a bad idea, and Sony is full of them. But Garfield and MacGuire are also rumored for Dr Strange, which Scott Derrickson all but confirmed by tweeting that the old Spidey films are mcu canon. Sony has no influence over Dr Strange. Like or not, this is almost certainly Feige’s idea. He also tweeted it was a joke to rattle people up. Dont Trumpatize this.
|
|